• HOME
  • Search & Results
  • Full Text
  • Thesis Details
 
Page: 205
 
Full Screen

  • TITLE
  • DEDICATION
  • CERTIFICATE
  • DECLARATION
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • CONTENTS
  • I. INTRODUCTION
  • 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
  • 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • Statistical Analysis
  • 1. Unpaired t-test
  • 2. Correlation analysis
  • 3. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
  • 4. LSD test
  • 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
  • 4.1 Control
  • Table 4.1.1 Height by levels of age of male controls
  • Table 4.1.2 Comparison of lung volumes between different age groups of male controls
  • Table 4.1.3 Comparison of flow rates between different age groups of male controls
  • Table 4.1.4 Height by levels of age of female controls
  • Table 4.1.5 Comparison of lung volurnes between different age groups of female controls
  • Table 4.1.6 Comparison of flow rates between different age groups of female controls
  • Table 4.1.7 Comparison of lung volumes between male and female controls
  • Table 4.1.8 Comparison of flow rates between male and female controls
  • 4.2 Wood Workers
  • Table 4.2.1 Height and exposure duration in male wood workers
  • Table 4.2.2 Comparison of lung volumes between control (C) and male wood workers (WW)
  • Table 4.2.3 Comparison of flow rates between control (C) and male wood workers (WW)
  • Table 4.2.4 Cornparison of lung volumes between different age groups of male wood workers
  • Table 4.2.5 Comparison of flow rates between different age groups of male wood workers
  • Table 4.2.6 Height and age by levels of exposure in male wood workers
  • Table 4.2.7 Comparison of lung volumes between different exposure groups of male wood workers
  • Table 4.2.8 Comparison of flow rates between different exposure groups of male wood workers
  • ITable 4.2.9 Correlalion analysis of lung volumes and flow rates with exposure duration of male wood workers
  • 4.3 Bakery Workers
  • Table 4.3.1 Height and exposure duration in male bakery workers
  • Table 4.3.2 Comparison of lung volumes between controls (C) and male bakery workers (BW)
  • Table 4.3.3 Comparison of flow rates between controls (C) and male bakery workers (BW)
  • Table 4.3.4 Comparison of lung volumes between different age groups of male bakery workers
  • Table 4.3.5 Comparison of flow rates between different age groups of male bakery workers
  • Table 4.3.6 Height and age by levels of exposure in male bakery workers
  • Table 4.3.7 Comparison of lung volumes between different exposure groups of male bakery workers
  • Table 4.3.8 Comparison of flow rates between different exposure groups of male bakery workers
  • Table 4.3.9 Correlation analysis of lung volumes and flow rates with exposure duration in male bakery workers
  • 4.4 Cotton Mill Workers
  • Table 4.4.1 Height and exposure duration in male cotton mill workers
  • Table 4.4.2 Comparison of lung volumes between controls (C) and male cotton mill workers (CW) )
  • Table 4.4.3 Comparison of flow rates between controls (C) and male cotton mill workers (CW)
  • Table 4.4.4 Comparison of lung volumes between different age groups of male cotton mill workers
  • Table 4.4.5 Comparison of flow rates between different age groups of male cotton mill workers
  • Table 4.4.6 Height and age by levels of exposure in male cotton mill workers
  • Table 4.4.7 Comparison of lung volumes between different exposure groups of male cotton mill workers
  • Table 4.4.8 Comparison of flow rates between different exposure groups of male cotton mill workers
  • Table 4.4.9 Comparison analysis of lung volumes and flow rates with exposure duration in male cotton mill workers
  • 4.5 Insecticide Plant Workers
  • Table 4.5.1 Height and exposure duration in male insecticide plant workers
  • Table 4.5.2 Comparison of lung volumes between controls (C) and male insecticide plant workers (IW)
  • Table 4.5.3 Comparison of flow rates between controls (C) and male insecticide plant workers (IW)
  • Table 4.5.4 Comparison of lung volumes between different age groups of male insecticide plant workers
  • Table 4.5.5 Comparison of flow rates between different age groups of male insecticide plant workers
  • Table 4.5.6 Height and age by levels of exposure in male insecticide plant workers
  • Table 4.5.7 Comparison of lung volumes between different exposure groups of male insecticide plant workers
  • Table 4.5.8 Comparison of flow rates between different exposure groups of male insecticide plant workers
  • Table 4.5.9 Correlation analysis of lung volumes and flow rates with exposure duration in male insecticide plant workers
  • 4.5 Press Workers
  • (a) Males
  • Table 4.6.1 Height and exposure duration in male press workers
  • Table 4.6.2 Comparison of lung volumes between controls (C) and male press workers (PW)
  • Table 4.6.3 Comparison of flow rates between controls (C) and male press workers (PW)
  • Table 4.6.4 Comparison of lung volumes between different age groups of male press workers
  • Table 4.6.5 Comparison of flow rates between different age groups of male press workers
  • Table 4.6.6 Height and age by levels of exposure in male press workers
  • Table 4.6.7 Comparison of lung volumes between different exposure groups of male press workers
  • Table 4.6.8 Comparison of flow rates between different exposure groups of male press workers
  • Table 4.6.9 Com analysis of lung volumes arid flow rates withexpz~sured urztikin in male press workers
  • (b) Females
  • Table 4.6.10 Height and exposure duration in female press workers
  • Table 4.6.11 Comparison of lung volumes between controls (C) and female press workers (PW)
  • Table 4.6.12 Comparison of flow rates between controls (C) and female press workers (PW)
  • Table 4.6.13 Comparison of lung volumes between different age groups of female press workers
  • Table 4.6.14 Comparison of flow rates between different age groups of female press workers
  • Table 4.6.15 Height and age by levels of exposure in female press workers
  • Table 4.6.16 Comparison of lung volums between different exposure groups of female press workers
  • Table 4.6.17 Comparison of flow rate between different exposure groups of female press workers
  • Table 4.6.18 Correlation analysis of lung volumes and flow rates withexposure duration in female press workers
  • Table 4.6.19 Comparison of lung volumes between male (M) and female (F) press workers
  • Table 4.6.20 Comparison of flow rates between male (M) and female (F) press workers
  • 4.7 Sedentary Workers
  • (a) Males
  • Table 4.7.1 Height and exposure duration in male sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.2 Comparison of lung volumes between controls (C) and male sedentary workers (SW)
  • Table 4.7.3 Comparison of flow rates between control (C) and male sedentary workers (SW)
  • Table 4.7.4 Comparison of lung volumes between different age groups of male sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.5 Comparison of flow rates between different age groups of male sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.6 Height and age by levels of exposure in male sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.7 Comparison of lung volumes between different exposure groups of male sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.8 Comparison of flow rates between different exposure groups of male sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.9 Correlation analysis of lung volumes and flow rates with exposure duration in male sedentary workers
  • (b) Females
  • Table 4.7.10 Height and exposure duration in female sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.11 Comparison of lung volumes between controls (C) and female sedentary workers (SW)
  • Table 4.7.12 Comparison of flow rates between controls (C) and female sedentary workers (SW)
  • Table 4.7.13 Comparison of lung volumes between different age groups of female sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.14 Comparison of flow rates between different age groups of female sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.15 Height and age by levels of exposure in female sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.16 Comparison of lung volumes between different exposure groups of female sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.17 Comparison of flow rates between different exposure groups of female workers
  • Table 4.7.18 Comparison analysis of lung volumes and flow rates with exposure duration in female sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.19 Comparison of lung volumes between male (M) and female (F) sedentary workers
  • Table 4.7.20 Comparison of flow rates between male (M) and female (F) sedentary workers
  • 4.8 Tailors
  • Table 4.8.1 Height and exposure duration in female tailors
  • Table 4.8.2 Comparison of lung volumes between control and female tailors
  • Table 4.8.3 Comparison of flow rates between control and female tailors
  • Table 4.8.4 Height and age by levels of exposure in female tailors
  • Table 4.8.5 Correlation analysis of lung volumes and flow rates with exposure duration in female tailors
  • 4.9 General Discussion
  • Table 4.9.1 Comparison of lung volumes among different occupational groups of G1 males
  • Table 4.9.2 Comparison of flow rates among different occupational groups of G1 males
  • Table 4.9.3 Comparison of lung volumes among different occupational groups of G2 males
  • Table 4.9.4 Comparison of flow rates among different occupational group of G2 males
  • Table 4.9.5 Comparison of lung volumes among different occupational groups of G3 males
  • Table 4.9.6 Comparison of flow rates among different occupational group of G3 males
  • Table 4.9.7 Comparison of lung volumes among different occupational groups of G1 females
  • Table 4.9.8 Comparison of flow rates among different occupational groups of G1 females
  • Table 4.9.9 Comparison of lung volumes among different occupational groups of G2 females
  • Table 4.9.10 Comparison of flow rates among different occupational groups of G2 female
  • Table 4.9.11 Comparison of lung volumes among different occupational groups of G3 females
  • Table 4.9.12 Comparison of flow rates among different occupational group of G3 females
  • Table 4.9.13 Comparison of lung volumes among different occupational groups of E1 males
  • Table 4.9.15 Comparison of lung volumes arnong different occupational groups of E2 males
  • Table 4.9.16 Comparison of flow rates among different occupational groups of E2 males
  • Table 4.9.17 Comparison of lung volumes among different occupational groups of E3 males
  • Table 4.9.18 Comparison of flow rates among different occupational groups of E3 males
  • Table 4.9.19 Comparison of lung volumes among different occupational groups of E1 females
  • Table 4.9.20 Comparison of flow rates among different occupational groups of E1 females
  • Table 4.9.21 Comparison of lung volumes between different occupational groups of E2 females
  • Table 4.9.22 Comparison of flow rates between different occupational groups of E2 females
  • Table 4.9.23 Comparison of lung volumes between different occupational groups of E fen, ales
  • Table 4.9.24 Comparison of flow rates between different occupational groups of E2 females
  • 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
  • Suggestions
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • APPENDICES
  • APPENDIX - I VlTALOGRAPH COMPACT-II SPIROMETER
  • APPENDIX - II PROFORMA STUDIES ON RESPIRATORY FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH OCCUPATIONS