• HOME
  • Search & Results
  • Full Text
  • Thesis Details
 
Page: 225
 
Full Screen

  • TITLE
  • DECLARATION
  • CERTIFICATE
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • DEDICATION
  • CONTENTS
  • LIST OF TABLES
  • LIST OF PLATES
  • LIST OF FIGURES
  • 1. INTRODUCTION
  • 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
  • Propagation
  • Bud grafting
  • Technique
  • Advantages of Vegetative Propagation
  • Rootstock
  • Biochemical studies
  • Incompatibility
  • Types of incompatibility
  • Prediction of incompatibility
  • Rubber
  • Tapping and bark renewal
  • Propagation
  • Seedlings
  • Budding
  • Green budding
  • Polybag plants
  • Stock-Scion Interaction
  • Constraints in Rubber Cultivation
  • Tapping Panel Dryness (TPD)
  • Genetic parameters and associations
  • Co-efficient of variation
  • Heritability
  • Clonal variability for yield and associated traits in rubber
  • Correlation
  • Associations among yield and yield component traits
  • Intra -clonal variations in rubber
  • Infra-clonal associations in rubber
  • 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • A. Nursery Study
  • Materials
  • Lay out of the study
  • Design of the experiment
  • Observations
  • Seeds and Seedlings
  • Budding
  • Bud-grafted seedlings and budded stumps
  • Growth
  • Surface morphology of the graft area
  • Polybag Nursery
  • Bud wood Nursery
  • Growth
  • Bark anatomy of the graft union
  • Sample collection
  • Processing of tissue and observations
  • Intraxylary phloem
  • Sample collection
  • Processing and observations
  • Yield recording
  • Leaf Diseases
  • Biochemical study
  • Estimation of Peroxidase
  • Sample preparation
  • Preparation of Phosphate buffer
  • Total Protein Estimation
  • Reagents used
  • Working Standard
  • Estimation
  • Detection of Esterase
  • Preparation of Gel
  • Preparation of separating gel
  • Sample Preparation
  • Genetic analysis
  • Sampling
  • Preparation of Genomic DNA
  • DNA amplification by PCR
  • Gel electrophoreis and photography
  • B. Observations on mature trees
  • Materials
  • Observations
  • Total volume of latex
  • Dry rubber content
  • Summer variations
  • Growth characters
  • Anatomical characters
  • Tapping panel dryness
  • Statistical Analysis
  • 4. RESULTS
  • A. NURSERY EXPERIMENT
  • 1.Variability due to stock sources
  • Root stock seeds and seedlings
  • A.1.1.1 Comparison of seed types for seed characters and germination percentage
  • A.1.1.2. Estimates of variability among the seed sources for seed characters and germination
  • A.1.1.3. Intraclonal variations (CV values) in seed types for seed weight and seed volume.
  • A.1.1.4. Comparison of seed types for biomass production (dry wt.) and plant height of young seedlings at the age of one month
  • A.1. 1. 5. Estimates of variability for biomass production and plant height of young seedlings
  • A. I.1.6. Comparison of seed sources for establishment and growth of the seedlings
  • A.1. 1. 7.Estimates of variability for transplantable germinated seeds, establishment success and buddability in terms of growth
  • Budding success
  • A.1.2.1. Comparison of seed sources for budding success
  • A 1. 2. 2. Estimates of variability for the number of plants budded and budding success
  • Morphological observations of bud union
  • A.1. 3. 1.Comparison of seed sources for the surface morphology of bud union
  • A 1.3.2. Estimates of variability for the surface characters of stock-scion union
  • Comparative merits of root stock sources for further growth and test tap yield of the grafted plants
  • Growth variations of budded stumps
  • A.1.4.1.1.Comparison of stock sources for growth variations of budded stumps, in terms of girth (cm)
  • A.1.4.1.2. Estimates of variability for growth variations of budded X
  • Sprouting
  • A.1.4.2.1. Comparison of the budded stumps raised using different stock sources for sprouting percentage and time taken for bud of stock sources for growth variations of polybag
  • The Growth variations of polybag plants
  • A.1.4.3.1. Comparison plants, in terms of girth and height (cms)
  • A.1.4.3.2.Estimates of variability for the growth variations of polybag plants
  • Growth variations of field plants, after one-year growth in the field
  • A 1.4.4.1. Comparison of stock sources for establishment and growth of grafted plants in the field, after one year.
  • Growth variations of grafted plants, after two years in the field
  • A.1.4.4.2. Estimates of variability due to stock types for establishment and growth of grafted plants in the field, after one year.
  • Variations of anatomical characters due to root stock sources
  • Total bark thickness
  • A.1.4.6.l.Comparison of field plants raised on different stock sources for bark structural characters of stock, scion and graft of grafted plants, raised on varying stock sources, interface
  • Soft bast and hard bast
  • Number of latex vessel rows
  • Disease susceptibility
  • A.1.4.7.1. Comparison for susceptibility to shoot rot and Oidium diseases
  • Biochemical parameters
  • Total protein content & Peroxidase activity
  • A.1.4.8.1. Total protein content and peroxidase activity of the plants raised using different stock sources and RRII 105 as scion
  • Esterase activity
  • Genetic polymorphism
  • Characterization of RAPD markers
  • A.1.4.8 2. Characteristics of esterase band of plants raised using different stock sources and RRII 105 as scion.
  • Analysis of polymorphic-bands associated with stock-scion interaction
  • Primer: OPA-18
  • Primer OPC-5
  • Primer OPE-5
  • Primer: OPE-12
  • 2.Variability between incompatible and compatible groups of plants
  • Comparison of incompatible with compatible groups of plants for anatomical characters
  • The orientation of axial tissue in the stock-scion interface
  • A.2.1.a. Comparison of incompatible with compatible plants for Quantitative anatomical traits.
  • A 2.1 b. Coefficients of variations and t values.
  • Comparison of incompatible with compatible graft types for positional girth variations at budded stump stage
  • A.2.2.1. Comparison of incompatible with compatible graft types for positional girth variations at budded stump stage.
  • Comparison of incompatible with compatible graft types for positional girth variations at polybag stage
  • A.1.3.1. Comparison of growth characters of incompatible and compatible graft types in polybags.
  • Comparison of incompatible and compatible graft types, in the bud wood nursery, for growth characters
  • A.2.4 1.Comparison of incompatible and compatible graft types, in the bud wood nursery, for growth characters. a. First year observations
  • A.2.4. l.Comparison of incompatible and compatible graft types, in the bud wood nursery, for growth characters. b. Second year observations
  • 3.correlations
  • Association among nursery characters
  • Correlations among seed characters, germination percentage and growth characters at juvenile stage
  • A.3.1.1.Correlations among seed characters, germination percentage and growth characters at juvenile stage.
  • Associations of anatomical characters with respect to different positions of the grafted plant
  • A.3.2.1 Correlation of two important bark characters, the bark thickness (X1) and number of latex vessel rows (X6) with respect to the different positions of the bud grafted plants, at the stock portion (P1), stock-scion interface (P2), scion base (P3) and at 50 cm height from the bud union (P4) after two years growth in the field
  • A.3.2.2Correlations of test tap yield with latex vessel rows and bark thickness at scion base
  • Associations among the growth characters at different growth phases
  • A.3.3.1. Associations among the growth characters at different growth phases, budded stump stage, polybag stage, and field plants grown over one year and two years after planting in the field, and the associations of such characters with test tap yield
  • Regressions
  • A.3.4.1.Regressions of the growth characters and test tap yield of field plants on the growth characters at budded stump stage and polybag stage
  • Regression equations
  • B. OBSERVATIONS ON MATURE TREES UNDER TAPPING
  • 1. Variability
  • Comparison of tapping side with untapped side of the tapping trees, for bark thickness and bark anatomical characters
  • B.1.1.1. Comparison of tapping side with untapped side for bark thickness and bark anatomical characters after one year tapping following 1/2Sd/3 tapping.
  • B.1.1.2. Bark thickness (mm) on tapping side and untapped side, at different height positions from the bud union, (at six monthly intervals of growth) of the trees under tapping.
  • Positional variations for growth in terms of girth
  • B.1.2.1. Positional variations of girth and mean girth increment (over two years) of the trees under tapping.
  • Quantity of intraxylary phloem and primary xylem points
  • B.1.3.1 Comparative.data on the number of intraxylary phloem and primary xylem points in tapped and untapped mature trees and untapped plants of two year old.
  • Intraclonal variations for the growth and yield factors of mature trees, under tapping
  • B.1.4.1. Intraclonal variations for the growth and yield factors of mature trees, under tapping.
  • B.1.4.2. Categorization of TPD affected trees, for different characters recorded before the onset of external symptoms of TPD.
  • 2. Correlations among growth characters and yield of mature trees under tapping
  • Correlations among growth characters
  • B.2.1. Correlations among growth characters.
  • Correlations among growth characters, latex volume and dry rubber content
  • B.2.2 Correlations among growth characters, latex volume and dry rubber content.
  • Correlations among yield factors
  • B.2.3. Correlations among yield factors.
  • Plate I Nurseries 1.
  • Plate 2 Nurseries 2.
  • Plate 3 Green budding.
  • Plate 4 Morphological symptoms of incompatibility.
  • Plate 5 Hevea bark structure.
  • Plate 6 Cross section of a stem.
  • Plate 7 Bark structure at the union interface.
  • Plate 8 Tapping panel dryness.
  • Plate 9 Zymograms of esterase.
  • Plate 10 RAPD profiles.
  • Fig. 1 Vigour in terms of number of leaf flushes.
  • Fig. 2 Percentage increase of bark thickness (both sides) and girth after first year of tapping.
  • Fig. 3 Number of primary xylem points and intraxylary phloem points in tapped, untapped and young trees.
  • 5. DISCUSSION
  • Root stock seeds and seedlings
  • Seed characters
  • Seedling growth
  • Budding success
  • Observations on surface morphology of the graft types Morphological marker for stock-scion incompatibility
  • Morphological marker for stock-scion incompatibility
  • Comparative merits of root stock sources for further growth and test tap yield of the grafted plants
  • Positional girth variations of budded stumps
  • Sprouting of scion bud
  • Growth in polybag nursery
  • Observations on field plants
  • Growth performances and test tap yield
  • Disease susceptibility,
  • Biochemical parameters
  • Total protein content
  • Peroxidase activity
  • Esterase activity
  • Genetic polymorphism
  • RAPD analysis
  • Growth performances and test tap yield in the second year
  • Comparison of stock sources for structural traits
  • Variability, due to incompatibility
  • The orientation of axial tissue in the stock-scion interface
  • Comparison of incompatible with compatible plants
  • Incompatibility effects on the vigor of budded stumps
  • Growth variations of incompatible and compatible grafts in polybags
  • Growth variations and yield trend of field plants
  • Quantitative anatomical characters
  • Correlations and regressions for early prediction of planting material
  • Associations among seed characters and nursery characters
  • Correlations among stock and scion portions of the grafted plants, with respect to anatomical characters
  • Associations among growth characters and test tap yield Early selection of compatible type of planting materials Observations on mature trees
  • Early selection of compatible type of planting materials
  • B. Observations on mature trees
  • 1.VARIABILITY
  • Comparison of tapping side with untapped side of the tapping trees, for bark thickness and bark anatomical characters
  • Subsequent effect of higher intensity of tapping on bark growth and girthing of trees
  • Formation of internal phloem
  • Intraclonal variations of growth and latex flow characters
  • Tapping panel dryness
  • Correlations among growth characters and yield of mature trees under tapping
  • 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
  • REFERENCES