• HOME
  • Search & Results
  • Full Text
  • Thesis Details
 
Page: 128
 
Full Screen

  • Title
  • DEDICATION
  • CERTIFICATE
  • DECLARATION
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • GLOSSARY
  • CONTENTS
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Review of Literature
  • 3. Methods
  • Statistical analysis
  • 4. Results
  • Table 4.1. Distribution of characteristics among the study population
  • Table 4.2. Comparison of lung volumes between control and exposed groups of 5 different industries
  • Table 4.3. Comparison of flow rates between control and exposed groups of 5 different industries
  • Fig. 4.1. Lung volumes of control and industrial workers.
  • Fig. 4.2. Flow rates of control and industrial workers.
  • 4.1 Comaprison of respiratory functions between industrial workers
  • Table 4.4. Lung volumes of industrial workers
  • Table 4.5. Flow rates of industrial workers
  • 4.2 Correlation analysis of respiratory functions with exposure duration ofindustrial workers
  • Table 4.6. Correlation analysis of lung volumes with exposure duration of HNL workers
  • Table 4.7. Correlation analysis of flow rates with exposure duration of HNL workers.
  • Table 4.8. Correlation analysis of lung volumes with exposure duration of IRE workers.
  • Table 4.9. Correlation analysis of flow rates with exposure duration of IRE workers
  • Table 4.10. Correlation analysis of lung volumes with exposure duration of FACT-UD workers.
  • Table 4.11. Correlation analysis of flow rates with exposure duration of FACT-UD workers.
  • Table 4.12. Correlation analysis of lung volumes with exposure duration of FACT-CD workers.
  • Table 4.13. Correlation analysis of flow rates with exposure duration of FACT-CD workers.
  • Table 4.14. Correlation analysis of lung volumes with exposure duration of cotton mill workers.
  • Table 4.15. Correlation analysis of flow rates with exposure duration of cotton mill workers.
  • 4.3 Comparison of respiratory functions between control and exposed groups, stratified by smoking status
  • Table 4.16. Lung volumes of control (C) and HNL workers grouped independently as non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S)
  • Table 4.17. Flow rates of control (C) and HNL workers grouped independently as non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S)
  • Table 4.18. Lung volumes of control (C) and IRE workers grouped independently as non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S)
  • Table 4.19. Flow rates of control (C) and IRE workers grouped independently as non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S)
  • Table 4.20. Lung volumes of control (C) and FACT-UD workers grouped independently as non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S)
  • Table 4.21. Flow rates of control (C) and FACT-UD workers groupedindependently as non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S)
  • Table 4.22. Lung volumes of control (C) and FACT-CD workers grouped independently as non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S)
  • Table 4.23. Flow rates of control (C) and FACT-CD workers grouped independently as non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S)
  • Table 4.24. Lung volumes of control (C) and cotton mill workers grouped independently as non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S)
  • Table 4.25. Flow rates of control (C) and cotton mill workers grouped independently as non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S)
  • 4.4 Comparison of industrial workers grouped as smokers and non-smokers stratified by exposure duration
  • Table 4.26. Analysis of variance of lung volumes among non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of 5 different industries under 10 years of exposure duration
  • Table 4.27. Analysis of variance of flow rates among non-smokers (NS) andsmokers of different industries under 10 years of exposure duration
  • Table 4.28. Analysis of variance of lung volumes among non-smokers and smokers of different industries of exposure duration between 10 and 20 years
  • Table 4.29. Analysis of variance of flow rates among non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S) of different industries of exposure duration between 10and 20 years
  • Table 4.30. Analysis of variance of lung volumes among non-smokers (NS) and smokers (S) of different industries above 20 years of exposure duration
  • Table 4.31. Analysis of variance of flow rates among non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) of 5 different industries above 20 years of exposure duration
  • 4.5 Comparison of control, smoker and non-smoker workers stratified by ageing
  • Table 4.32a. Lung volumes of control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of HNL under different age groups
  • Table 4.32b. Significance of lung volumes between different age groups among control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of HNL.
  • Table 4.33a Flow rates of control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of HNL under different age groups
  • Table 4.33b. Significance of flow rates between different age groups among control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of HNL.
  • Table 4.34a Lung volumes of control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of IRE under different age groups
  • Table 4.34b. Significance of lung volumes between different age groups amongcontrol (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of IRE
  • Table 4.35a. Flow rates of control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of IRE under different age groups
  • Table 4.35b. Significance of flow rates between different age groups among control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of IRE.
  • Table 4.36a. Lung volumes of control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of FACT-UD under different age groups
  • Table 4.36b. Significance of lung volumes between different age groups among control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of FACT-UD.
  • Table 4.37a. Flow rates of control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of FACT-UD under different age groups
  • Table 4.37b. Significance of flow rates between different age groups among control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of FACT-UD
  • Table 4.38a. Lung volumes of control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of FACT-CD under different age groups
  • Table 4.38b Significance of lung volumes between different age groups among control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of FACT-CD
  • Table 4.39a. Flow rates of control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of FACT-CD under different age groups
  • Table 4.39b. Significance of flow rates between different age groups among control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of FACT-CD.
  • Table 4.40a. Lung volumes of control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of cotton mill under different age groups
  • Table 4.40b. Significance of lung volumes between different age groups among control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of cotton mill.
  • Table 4.41a. Flow rates of control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of cotton mill under different age groups
  • Table 4.41b. Significance of flow rates between different age groups among control (C), non-smoker (NS) and smoker (S) workers of cotton mill.
  • 5. Discussion
  • 6. Summary and Conclusion
  • References