• HOME
  • Search & Results
  • Full Text
  • Thesis Details
 
Page: 290
 
Full Screen

  • TITLE
  • DECLARATION
  • CERTIFICATE
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • CONTENTS
  • LIST OF TABLES
  • LIST OF FIGURES
  • I. INTRODUCTION
  • 1.1 Assessment In Education
  • 1.2 Need for the Study Pertaining to Continuous Internal Assessment
  • 1.3 Contextual Background of the Problem Statement of the Problem
  • INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
  • 1.4 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
  • 1.5 Definition of Key Terms
  • 1.6 Objectives of the Study
  • 1.7 Hypotheses of the Study
  • 1.8 Methodology of the Study in Brief
  • 1.9 Scope of the Study
  • 1.10 Limitations of the Study
  • 1.11 Organisation of the Report
  • References
  • II. SURVEY OF RELATED LITERATURE
  • 2.1 METHODS OF EVALUATION
  • 2.2 FACTORS IN INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
  • 2.2.1 Factors in Student Assessment
  • 2.3 PEER EVALUATION
  • 2.4 SELF-EVALUATION
  • 2.5 PARENT OPINIONS ON STUDENT EVALUATION
  • 2.6 CONCLUSION
  • References
  • III. METHODOLOGY
  • 3.1 METHOD ADOPTED FOR THE STUDY
  • 3.2 TOOLS USED FOR THE STUDY
  • The Questionnaire
  • Questionnaire for Teachers
  • Questionnaire for Students
  • Administration of the Questionnaire for Teachers and Students
  • Opinionnaire for Teachers, Students and Parents
  • ltem Analysis
  • 3.1 t value calculated for the items in the Opinionnaire
  • Reliability of the Opinionnaire
  • Validity.
  • Administration of the Final Form of the Opinionnaire for Teachers,
  • 3.3 POPULATION AND SAMPLE
  • Population
  • Sample
  • Sample Details of Teachers and Students Questionnaire
  • 3.2 Details of the Questionnaire for Teachers and Students-Distributed, Collected and Selected
  • 3.3 Course Category wise Details of Sample of Questionnaire for Teachers and Students
  • Sample for the Opinionnaire to Teachers, Students and Parents
  • 3.4 Break up of the Sample based Locality, Management and Sex
  • 3.5 Sample Details of Opinionnaire Distributed, Collected and Selected
  • 3.6 Course Category wise Details of Samples of Opinionnaire Selected
  • 3.7 Break up of the Sample of Opinionnaire based on Locality, Management and Sex
  • 3.8 Details of Sample based on Institutions
  • 3.4 CONSOLIDATION AND PROCESSING OF DATA
  • 3.5 STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES ADOPTED
  • References
  • IV. ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
  • 4.1 ANALYSIS OF THE TEACHERS QUESTIONNAIRE
  • 4.1 Data and Result of x2 Test of Significance for the Difference in the Response of Teachers (N = 104)
  • 4.2 Rank Order of the Responses of Teachers on the Percentage of Marks for Internal Assessment and External Examination (N = 104)
  • 4.3 Rank Order of the Responses of Teachers on the Persons Entitled to do the Assessment (N = 104)
  • 1.Graphical Representation of the Responses of Teachers on the Persons Entitled to do the Assessment
  • 4.4 Rank order of the Suggestions of Teachers for Making the System of Internal Assessment more Reliable and Acceptable (N = 104)
  • 4.5 The Aspects to be Considered to Assess the Student Internally (N = 104)
  • 4.6 Data and Result of X2 Test of Significance for the Difference in the Response of Teachers (N = 104)
  • 4.1.1 Comparison of Opinion of Teachers based on Subsamples
  • 4.7 Data and Results of Test of Significance of Difference on the Opinion of Teachers based on Gender
  • 4.8 Data and Results of Test of Significance of Difference on the Opinion of Teachers based on Locale (N = 104)
  • 4.9 Data and Results of Test of Significance of Difference on the Opinion of Government and Aided College Teachers
  • 4.10 Data and Results of Test of Significance of Difference on the Opinion of Government and Unaided College Teachers
  • 4.11 Data and Results of Test of Significance of Difference on the Opinion of Aided and Unaided College Teachers
  • 4.12 Data and Results of Test of Significance of Difference on the Opinion of Teachers based on Teaching Experience
  • 4.2 ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS QUESTIONNAIRE
  • 4.13 Data and Result of x2 Test of Significance for the Difference in the Response of Students (N = 312)
  • 4.14 Rank Order of the Nature of Scholastic Assessment (N = 312)
  • 4.15 Rank Order of the Responses of Students on the Percentage of Marks for Internal Assessment and External Examination (N = 312)
  • 2. Graphical Representation of the Responses of Students on the Proportion of Marks for Internal Assessment and External Examination
  • 4.16 Rank Order of the Responses of Students on the Persons Entitled to do the Assessment (N = 312)
  • 3. Graphical Representation of the Responses of Students on the Persons Entitled to do the Assessment
  • 4.17 Rank order of the Aspects to be Considered for Internal Assessment (N = 312)
  • 4.18 Responses of Students on the Arguments in Favour of Internal Assessment (N = 312)
  • 4. Graphical Representation of the Responses of Students on the Arguments in Favour of Internal Assessment
  • 4.19 Responses of Students on the Arguments against the System of Internal Assessment (N = 312)
  • 5. Graphical Representation of the Responses of Students on the Arguments against the System of Internal Assessment
  • 4.2.1 Comparison of Opinion of Students based on Subsamples
  • 4.20 Data and Results of Test of Significance of Difference on the Opinion of Students based on Gender (N = 312)
  • 4.21 Data and Results of Test of Significance of Difference on the Opinion of Students based on Locale (N = 312)
  • 4.3 ANALYSIS OF THE DATA COLLECTED THROUGH THE OPlNlONNAlREFOR TEACHERS, STUDENTS AND PARENTS
  • 4.3.1 Analysis of the Opinionnaire to Teachers
  • 4.22 Data and Result of X2 Test of Significance for the Difference in the Response of Teachers based on the Opinionnaire (N = 254)
  • 4.3.2 Analysis of the Opinionnaire to Students
  • 4.23 Data and Result of x2 Test of Significance for the Difference in the Response of Students based on the Opinionnaire (N = 406)
  • 4.3.3 Analysis of the Opinionnaire to Parents
  • 4.24 Data and Result of X2 Test of Significance for the Difference in the Response of Parents based on the Opinionnaire (N = 102)
  • 4.3.4 Comparison of the Opinion of Teachers, Students and Parents
  • 4.25 Results of Test of Significance of the Difference in the Mean Scores of Teachers, Students and Parents on the Various Aspects of Internal Assessment
  • 4.4 TENABILITY OF THE HYPOTHESES
  • References
  • V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
  • 5.1 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
  • 5.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
  • 5.3 HYPOTHESES FOR THE STUDY
  • 5.4 METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY IN BRIEF
  • 5.5 MAJOR FINDINGS
  • 5.6 MAJOR CONCLUSIONS
  • 5.7 EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY
  • 5.8 SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • LIST OF APPENDICES
  • APPENDIX I - Questionnaire for Teachers
  • APPENDIX II - Questionnaire for Students
  • APPENDIX III Opinionnaire for Teachers, Students and Parents (Pilot study)
  • APPENDIX IV Opinionnaire for Teachers, Students and Parents (Final form)
  • APPENDIX V List of Experts
  • APPENDIX VI List of Institutions selected for the study