• HOME
  • Search & Results
  • Full Text
  • Thesis Details
 
Page: 174
 
Full Screen

  • TITLE
  • DEDICATION
  • DECLARATION
  • CERTIFICATE
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • ABSTRACT
  • PREFACE
  • ABBREVIATIONS
  • CONTENTS
  • List of Tables
  • List of Figures
  • I. INTRODUCTION
  • II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
  • II. 1. Major constraints of acid soils
  • II. 2. Distribution of acid soils
  • II. 3. Rubber growing soils in India
  • II. 4. Impact of rubber cultivation on soil properties
  • II. 5. Sources of soil acidity
  • II. 6. Forms of soil acidity
  • II. 7. Forms of Al
  • II. 8. Management of acid soils
  • II. 9. Lime requirement
  • II. 10. Liming materials
  • II. 11. Effect of liming on soil properties
  • II. 12. Crop responses to liming
  • III. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • III.1. Characterization of soil acidity in rubber growing soils
  • III.1.1. Collection of soil samples
  • Table-1. Details of the soil series
  • III.1.2. Physicochemical properties
  • III.1.2.1. Soil reaction (pH)
  • III.1.2.2. Cation exchange capacity (CEC)
  • III.1.2.3. Base saturation per cent
  • III.1.2.4. Particle size analysis
  • III.1.2.5. Organic carbon (OC)
  • III.1.3. Forms of acidity
  • III.1.3.I. Total potential acidity (TPA) (Peech , 1962)
  • III.1.3.2. Exchangeable acidity (EA) (Mc Lean, 1965)
  • III.1.3.3 pH dependent acidity (PA)
  • III.1.4. Forms of Al
  • III.I.4.I. Exchangeable Al (Ex. Al) (Mclean 1965)
  • III.I.4.2. Extractable Al (Extr. Al) (Mclean 1965)
  • III.I.4.3. Non exchangeable Al (Non Ex.Al)
  • III.I.4.4. Soluble Al (Sol. Al)
  • III.I.4.5. Total Al
  • III.I.4.6. Oxalate extractable and dithionate extractable Fe and Al
  • III.1.5. Total, DTPA extractable and exchangeable Mn and Fe
  • III.1.6. Effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC)
  • III.1.7. Aluminium saturation per cent
  • III.2. Lime requirement (LR) ) of rubber growing soils
  • III.2.1. Shoemaker, Mc Lean and Pratt method (SMP method) (Shoemaker, 1961)
  • III.2.2. Peech method (BaCl2 -TEA method) (Peech, 1965)
  • III.2.3. Adams and Evans method (Adams and Evans, 1962)
  • III.2.4. Exchangeable Al method (Kamprath, 1970)
  • III.3. Effect of liming on nutrient availability - Incubation Experiment
  • III.4. Effect of liming on availability of nutrients and growth of rubber seedlings in the nursery
  • III.5. Effect of liming on translocation of calcium in different plant parts
  • III. 6. Comparative evaluation of liming materials on nutrient availability and growth of rubber seedlings in the nursery
  • IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
  • IV.1. Characterization of soil acidity in rubber growing soils
  • IV.1.1. Physicochemical properties of the soil
  • IV.1.1.1. Soil reaction- Soil pH in different solvents and lime potential
  • Table 2. Soil pH and lime potential
  • IV.1.1.2. Organic carbon (OC)
  • IV.1.1.3. Exchangeable bases
  • IV.1.1.3.1. Exchangeable calcium
  • IV.1.1.3.2. Exchangeable magnesium
  • IV.1.1.3.4. Exchangeable potassium
  • IV.1.1.4. Cation exchange capacity (CEC)
  • IV.1.1.5. Base saturation per cent (BS)
  • Table 3. Physicochemical properties of the soil
  • IV.1.1.6. Electrical conductivity (EC)
  • IV.1.1.7. Particle size analysis
  • Table 4. Particle size composition of the soil
  • Fig.1 Distribution of clay in different soil series
  • IV.1.2. Nature of Soil Acidity
  • IV.1.2.1. Total Potential Acidity (TPA)
  • Table 5. Forms of acidity in different soil series (cmol/kg)
  • IV.1.2.2. Exchangeable Acidity (EA)
  • IV.1.2.3. pH- dependent acidity (PA)
  • Fig. 2 Forms of acidity in different soil
  • Fig. 3 Relation between exchangeable acidity and exchangeable Al
  • IV.1.3. Forms of Al
  • IV.1.3.1. Exchangeable Al (Ex. Al)
  • Table 6. Forms of Al in different soil series
  • Fig.3 Forms of AI in different soil series
  • Fig. 5 Distribution of exchangeable Al and pH
  • IV.1.3.2. Soluble Al (Sol. Al)
  • IV.1.3.3. Extractable Al (Extr. Al)
  • IV.1.3.4 Non exchangeable Al (Non Ex.Al)
  • IV.1.3.5. Total Al
  • Fig.6 Distribution of total Al in different soil series
  • IV.1.4. Exchangeable, DTPA and Total Mn
  • Table 7. Exchangeable, DTPA and total Mn
  • Fig. 7. Distribution of exchangeable Mn in different soil series
  • Fig. 8 Distribution of DTPA – Mn in different soil series
  • Fig. 9 Distribution of total Mn in different soil series
  • IV.1.5. Exchangeable, DTPA and total Fe
  • Table 8. Exchangeable, DTPA extractable and total Fe
  • Fig. 10 Exchangeable Fe in different soil series
  • Fig. 11 Distribution of DTPA - Fe in different soil series
  • Fig. 12 Distribution of total Fe in different soil series
  • IV.1.6. Acid ammonium oxalate extractable Al (Alo) and Fe (Feo)
  • Table 9. Acid ammonium oxalate extractable Al (Alo) and Fe (Feo)
  • IV.1.7. Dithionate citrate bicarbonate extractable Al (Ald) and Fe (Fed)
  • Table 10. Dithionate citrate bicarbonate extractable Al (Ald) and Fe (Fed)
  • Fig. 13 Distribution of dithionate Al in different soil series
  • Fig 15 Distribution of oxalate Fe/dithionate Fe in different soil series
  • IV.1.8. Effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC)
  • Table 11. Effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC)
  • IV.1.9 Relation between pH and aluminium saturation percent
  • Table 12. Relation of pH with soluble Al and Al saturation
  • Fig.16 Relation between pH and Al saturation
  • IV.1.10. Correlation
  • Fig. 17 Effect of organic carbon on pH dependent acidity
  • Fig. 18 Effect of Free iron oxide on exchange acidity
  • IV.2 Lime requirement of rubber growing soils
  • IV.2.1 Estimation of Lime requirement
  • Fig. 19 Lime requirement by different methods
  • IV.2.2. Correlation between LR and soil properties
  • IV.3. Effect of liming on soil nutrient availability – Incubation study
  • IV.3.1 Pre-treatment nutrient status of soil
  • IV.3.2. Effect of liming on soil pH
  • Fig.20 Effect of liming on soil pH
  • IV.3.3 Effect of liming on soil organic carbon (OC)
  • Fig.21 Effectf liminon ornic carbon
  • IV.3.4 Effect of liming on available phosphorus
  • Table 20. Effect of liming on available P (ppm)
  • Fig.22 Effect of liming on availale phosorus
  • IV. 3.5 Effect of liming on available potassium and magnesium
  • Fig. 23 Effect of liming on available K
  • Fig.24 Effect of liming on available Mg
  • IV.3.6 Effect of liming on available calcium
  • Table 23. Effect of liming on available Ca (ppm)
  • Fig. 25 Effect of liming on available Ca
  • IV.3.7.Effect of liming on available micronutrients and exchangable Al
  • IV.4. Effect of liming on growth of rubber seedlings in the nursery
  • IV.4.1. Initial nutrient status of the soil
  • IV.4.2. ffect of liming on soil nutrient status- 15 day after liming
  • IV.4.3. Effect of liming on diameter of plants
  • Fig.26 Effect of liming on diameter of plants
  • IV.4.4.Effect of liming on the leaf nutrient concentration
  • Table 28. Effect of liming on leaf nutrient status
  • IV.4.5. Effect of liming on soil nutrient status- one year after liming
  • Table 29. Effect of liming on soil nutrient status (0-30 cm) -one year after liming
  • Table 30. Effect of liming on soil nutrient status (30-60cm) -one year after liming
  • IV.5 Effect of liming on translocation of calcium in different plant parts
  • IV.5.1 Effect of liming on dry matter production in budded stumps- glass house experiment
  • Fig.27 Effect of liming on dry matter production
  • IV.5.2. Effect of liming on nutrient content of leaves
  • IV.5.3. Efffect of liming on nutrient status of petiole
  • Table 34. Effect of liming on nutrient status of petiole
  • IV.5.4. Effect of liming on nutrient content of stem
  • IV.5.5. Effect of liming on nutrient content of root
  • Table 36. Effect of liming on nutrient content of root
  • IV.5.6 Influence of liming on uptake of nutrients
  • Table 37. Influence of liming on total nutrnt uptake (mg/pot)
  • IV.5.7. Effect of liming on soil available Ca and pH - after uprooting plants
  • Table 38. Effect of liming on available Ca and pH - after uprooting the plants
  • IV.6.Comparative evaluation of liming materials on nutrient availability and growth of rubber seedlings in the nursery
  • IV.6.1. Effect of liming materials on soil pH
  • Table 40. Effect of liming materials on soil pH
  • IV.6.2. Effect of liming materials on diameter (cm) of rubber seedlings
  • Table 41 Effect of liming materials on diameter of rubber seedlings
  • Fig. 28 Effect of different liming materials on diameter of rubber seedling
  • IV.6.3. Effect of liming materials on leaf nutrient status - one year after liming
  • IV.6.4 Effect of liming materials on soil nutrient status (0-15cm) - one year after liming
  • Table- 42. Effect of liming materials on nutrient status of the soil (0- 15cm) - oneTyear after liming
  • Table 43. Effect of liming materials on nutrient status of the soil (15-30cm) - one year after liming
  • IV.6.5 Residual effect of liming materials on growth and nutrient availability
  • Fig.29 Residual effect of different liming materials diameter of rubber seedings
  • Table 45. Residual effect of liming materials on soil nutrient status (0-30cm)
  • Table 46. Residual effect of liming materials on soil micronutrient status (0-30cm)
  • V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
  • 1. Characterization of soil acidity in rubber growing soils
  • 2. Lime requirement of the rubber growing soils
  • 3. Effect of liming on pH and nutrient availability-Incubation experiment
  • 4. Effect of liming on availability of nutrients and growth of rubber seedlings in the nursery
  • 5. Effect of liming on translocation of Calcium to different plant parts
  • 6. Comparative evaluation of liming materials on growth of rubber seedlings
  • References
  • Publications