• HOME
  • Search & Results
  • Full Text
  • Thesis Details
 
Page: 476
 
Full Screen

  • TITLE
  • CERTIFICATE
  • DECLARATION
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • CONTENTS
  • List of Tables
  • List of Figures
  • List of Appendices
  • I. lntroduction
  • 1.1 Conceptualisation of the Problem.
  • 1.2. Need and Significance of the Study.
  • 1.3. Statement of the Problem.
  • 1.4. Definition of Key Terms
  • 1.5. Hypotheses
  • 1.6. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.7. Scope and Limitations of the Study.
  • 1.8. Organisation of the Report
  • References
  • II. Theoretical Overview
  • 2.1 Curriculum and instruction.
  • 2.1. Possible Shared and Unique Aspects of Instructional Development and Curriculum.
  • 2.2 Theory of Teaching.
  • 2.3. Cognitive Style and Learning
  • 2.2. Cognition and its subdivisions.
  • 2.4. Teaching Models.
  • 2.3. Families of Models of Teaching.
  • 2.5. Concepts and Conceptual Understanding.
  • 2.4. A conceptual network of Dog.
  • 2.5. Interrelation of Facts, Concepts of Generalizations.
  • 2.6. Levels of Concept Attainment.
  • 2.7. Conceptual hierarchies.
  • 2.6. The Concept Attainment Model
  • 2.8. Dimensions of Teaching Models.
  • 2.9. Outcomes of Information Processing.
  • 2.7. Strategies for Learning Concepts.
  • 2.8 Bruners Cognitive Psychology- Influence in Learning and Teaching.
  • Reference
  • III. Review of Related Literature
  • 3.1 Comparison of Different Strategies of Concept Attainment Model.
  • 3.2 Comparison of Concept Attainment Model with Other Models and Traditional Method.
  • 3.3 Factors affecting Concept Learning.
  • 3.4 Concept Learning and Types of Examples Used.
  • 3.5 Academically Disadvantaged Children: Concept and Characteristics.
  • 3.6 Educational Programmes and Achievement of Academically Disadvantaged Children
  • References
  • IV. Methodology
  • 4.1 Method Adopted.
  • 4.1. Non Equivalent Pretest - Posttest Control Group Design.
  • 4.2. Design of the Study.
  • 4.2 Tools Used for the Study.
  • 4.2.1 Lesson Transcripts bast!d on Concept Attainment Model of instruction.
  • 1. Concept Analysis.
  • 2. Preparation of Content Goals.
  • 3. Phases of Concept Attainment Model of instruction.
  • 4.2.2. Achievement Test in Mathematics.
  • 4.3 Lesson Format for CAM
  • 4.2.3. Cognitive Ability Test.
  • 4.2.4 Rao Achievement Motivation Test.
  • 4.2.5. Measurement of Socio- economic Status.
  • .4.2.6. Self-Concept Inventory.
  • 4.2.7. Measurement of Study Habits.
  • 4.2.8. Measurement of Interest in Mathematics.
  • 4.2.9. Measuring Attitude for Mathematics.
  • 4.2.10. Measurement of Home Learning Environment
  • 4.2.11. Measurement of Intelligence.
  • 4.3 Sample of the Study.
  • 4.4 The Experiment Conducted.
  • 4.5. Statistical Methods Adopted.
  • References
  • V. Analysis of Data and Results
  • statistical techniques
  • Summary of the Analysis Done.
  • Analysis in Detail
  • 5.1. Pretest and adjusted posttest means in achievement of academically disadvantaged students in the experimental and the control groups.
  • 5.2. Pretest and adjusted posttest means in achievement in mathematics of academically advantaged students in the experimental and control groups.
  • 5.3. Pretest and adjusted posttest means in cognitive ability of academically disadvantaged students in the experimental and control groups.
  • 5.4. Pretest and adjusted post test advantaged students in the experimental and control groups.
  • 5.5. Pretest and adjusted posttest means in achievement in mathematics of academically disadvantaged students and academically advantaged students in the experimental group.
  • 5.6. Comparison of progress in achievement in mathematics made by academically advantaged and academically disadvantaged students in the experimental and control groups.
  • 5.7. Comparison of progress in cognitive ability made by academically advantaged and academically disadvantaged students in the experimental and control groups.
  • Major Hypothesis.
  • References
  • VI. Summary and Conclusions
  • Concept Attainment Model of instruction
  • Objectives of the study
  • Experimental Design
  • Sample of the study
  • Experiment Conducted.
  • Analysis of Data
  • CONCLUSIONS
  • Implications of the study
  • Suggestions for further research
  • Suggestions
  • References
  • BIBILIOGRAPHY
  • APPENDIX A: Concept Attainment Model Lessons
  • APPENDIX B: Achievement Test -Part I (Draft Form)
  • APPENDIX C: Achievement Test -Part II (Draft Form)
  • APPENDIX D: Answer sheet with Key (Achievement Test -Part I (Draft Form)
  • APPENDIX E: Answer sheet with Key (Achievement Test -Part II (Draft Form)
  • APPENDIX F: Difficulty Index and Discriminating Power- Achievement Test -Part I
  • APPENDIX G: Difficulty Index and Discriminating Power- Achievement Test -Part II
  • APPENDIX H: Achievement Test -Part I (Final Form)
  • APPENDIX I: Achievement Test -Part II (Final Form)
  • APPENDIX J: Answer sheet with Key (Achievement Test -Part I (Final Form)
  • APPENDIX K: Answer sheet with Key (Achievement Test -Part II (Final Form)
  • APPENDIX L: Cognitive Ability Test (Draft Form)
  • APPENDIX M: Answer sheet with Key (Cognitive Ability Test (Draft Form)
  • APPENDIX N: Difficulty index and. Discriminating Power- Cognitive Ability Test
  • APPENDIX O: Cognitive Ability Test (Final Form)
  • APPENDIX P: Answer sheet with Key (Cognitive Ability Test (Final Form)
  • APPENDIX Q: Rao Achievement Motivation Test APPENDIX R: Socio-Economic Status Scale
  • APPENDIX R: Socio-Economic Status Scale
  • APPENDIX S: Self-concept Inventory
  • APPENDIX T: Study Habits Inventory
  • APPENDIX U: Mathematics Interest Inventory
  • APPENDIX V: Mathematics Attitude Scale
  • APPENDIX W: Home Learning Environment Inventory
  • APPENDIX X: List of Experts