• HOME
  • Search & Results
  • Full Text
  • Thesis Details
 
Page: 259
 
Full Screen

  • Title
  • DEDICATION
  • DECLARATION
  • CERTIFICATE
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • CONTENTS
  • List of tables
  • List of figures
  • 1 Introduction
  • 1.1 Origin and distribution
  • 1.2 Narrow genetic diversity
  • 1 3 Broadening the genetic base for biotic and biotic stresses
  • 1 4 Germplasm resources
  • 1.4.1 1981 Rubber Research and Devolopment Board (IRRDB) collection
  • 1.4.2 Characterisation, evaluation and utilisation of wild germplasm
  • 1.5 Genetic studies
  • 1.5.1 Coefficients of variation
  • 1.5.2 Heritability and genetic advance
  • 1.5.3 Correlation
  • 1.5.4 Genetic divergence
  • 1.6 Objectives of the study
  • 2 Materials and methods
  • 2.1 Location
  • 2.2 Experimental materials
  • 1 List of genotypes selected for the study
  • 2.3 Experimental methods
  • 2.3.1 Descriptors for juvenile characterisation
  • 2.3.2 Morphological characters
  • 2.3.3 Stomatal characters
  • 2.3.6 Photography
  • 2.3.4 Leaf anatomical investigations
  • 2.3.5 Bark anatomical investigations
  • 2.4 Statistical methods
  • 2.4.1 Genetic variability
  • 2.4.1.1 Analysis of variance
  • 2.4.2 Genetic parameters
  • 2.4.2.1 Phenotypic and genotypic variance
  • 2.4.2.2 Coefficients of variation
  • 2.4.2.3 Heritability in the broad sense
  • 2.4.2.4 Genetic advance
  • 2.4.3 Correlation
  • 2.4.4 Factor analysis
  • 2.4.5 Genetic divergence
  • 2.4.6 Performance index
  • 3 Results
  • 3 1 Juvenile characterisation
  • 2 Descriptors and frequency of distribution of the wild genotypes
  • 3 Description of the wild genotypes along with control as per the descriptor.
  • 3.2 Genetic variability
  • 3.2.1 Analysis of variance
  • 4 ANOVA for the growth characters during the first year
  • 5 ANOVA for test tap yield for the first three years
  • 6 ANOVA for leaf structural characters in the third year
  • 7 ANOVA for bark structural characters in the third year
  • 3.2.2 General performance of the wild genotypes
  • 3.2.2.1 Morphological characters
  • 8 Range and general mean of growth characters in comparison with control.
  • 9 Mean genotypic performance for the growth characters during first year
  • 3.2.2.2 Test tap yield over three years
  • 10 Range and general mean of test tap yield of wild genotypes and control
  • 11 Mean test tap yield of the wild genotypes and the control
  • 3.2.2.3 Leaf structural characters
  • 12 Range and general mean of leaf structural characters in the third year
  • 13 Mean values for the leaf structural characters in the third year
  • 3.2.2.4 Bark structural characters
  • 14 Range and general mean of bark structural characters in the third year
  • 15 Mean values for bark structural characters in the third year
  • 3.2.3 Provenance-wise comparison of performance
  • 3.2.3.1 Morphological characters
  • 3.2.3.2 Test tap yield over three years
  • 16 Provenance-wise performance for growth characters in the first year
  • 3.2.3.3 Leaf structural characters
  • 17 Provenance-wise performance for test tap yield over three years
  • 18 Provenance-wise comparison for leaf structural characters in third year
  • 3.2.3.4 Bark structural characters
  • 3.3 Genetic parameters
  • 19 Provenance-wise performance for bark structural characters in third year
  • 3.3.1 Phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variation
  • 3.3.1.1 Morphological characters
  • 20 Coefficients of variation, heritability and genetic advance for growth characters in the first year
  • 3.3.1.2 Test tap yield over three years
  • 21 Coefficient of variation, heritability and genetic advance for test tap yield over three years.
  • 3.3.1.3 Leaf structural characters
  • 22 Coefficient of variation, heritabilty and genetic advance for leaf structural characters in the third year
  • 3.3.1.4 Bark structural characters
  • 3.3.2 Heritability (broad sense)
  • 3.3.2.1 Morphological characters
  • 23 Coefficient of variation, heritability and genetic advance for bark structural characters in the third year
  • 3.3.2.2 Test tap yield over three years
  • 3.3.2.3 Leaf structural characters
  • 3.3.2.4 Bark structural characters
  • 3.3.3 Genetic advance
  • 3.3.3.1 Morphological characters
  • 3.3.3.2 Test tap yield over three years
  • 3.3.3.3 Leaf structural characters
  • 3.3.3.4 Bark structural characters
  • 3.4 Character associations
  • 3.4.1 Morphological characters
  • 24 Correlation coefficients of growth characters with yield in the first year
  • 3.4.2 Leaf structural characters
  • 25 Correlation coefficients of leaf structural characters with yield in the third year
  • 3.4.3 Bark structural characters
  • 26 Phenotypic correlation coefficients of bark structural characters with yield in the third year
  • 27 Genotypic correlation coefficients of bark structural characters with yield in the third year
  • 28 Environmental correlation coefficients of bark structural characters with yield in the third year
  • 3.5 Factor analysis
  • 29 Factor loadings and communalities of the pooled characters
  • 3.6 Genetic divergence- D² analysis
  • 30 Distribution of wild genotypes in divergent clusters
  • 31 Inter and Intra-cluster distances in D2analysis in the wild genotypes
  • 3.7 Performance index
  • 32 Wild genotypes ranked on the basis of performance index
  • 33 Mean values of selected characters for the selected genotypes
  • 4 Discussion
  • 4.1 Juvenile characterisation
  • 4.2 Genetic variability
  • 4.2.1 Analysis of variance
  • 4.2.2 Performance of the wild genotypes
  • 4.2.2.1 Morphological characters
  • 4.2.2.2 Test tap yield over three years
  • 4.2.2.3 Leaf structural characters
  • 4.2.2.4 Bark structural characters
  • 4.2.3 Provenance-wise performance of the wild genotypes
  • 4.2.3.1 Morphological characters
  • 4.2.3.2 Test tap yield over three years
  • 4.2.3.3 Leaf structural characters
  • 4.2.3.4 Bark structural characters
  • 4.3 Genetic parameters
  • 4.3.1 Phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variation
  • 4.3.1.1 Morphological characters
  • 4.3.1.2 Test tap yield over three years
  • 4.3.1.3 Leaf structural characters
  • 4.3.1.4 Bark structural characters
  • 4.3.2 Heritability (broad sense)
  • 4.3.2.1 Morphological characters
  • 4.3.2.2 Test tap yield over three years
  • 4.3.2.3 Leaf structural characters
  • 4.3.2.4 Bark structural characters
  • 4.3.3 Genetic advance
  • 4.3.3.1 Morphological characters
  • 4.3.3.2 Test tap yield over three years
  • 4.3.3.3 Leaf structural characters
  • 4.3.3.4 Bark structural characters
  • 4.4 Character associations
  • 4.4.1 Morphological characters
  • 4.4.2 Leaf structural characters
  • 4.4.3 Bark structural characters
  • 4.5 Factor analysis
  • 4.6 Genetic divergence- D² analysis
  • 4.7 Performance index
  • 1 A wild genotype (AC 426) showing hemispherical, distantly placed leaf storeys
  • 2 A wild genotype (AC 995) showing truncate, closely placed leaf storeys, with short petioles
  • 3 A wild genotype (AC 966) showing open leaf storey, with very long petioles placed at acute angles
  • 4 A wild genotype (RO 322) showing tall habit, with intermediately separated leaf storeys
  • 5 Leaflets showing elliptical (AC 604) and obovate (RO 316) shape
  • 6 Leaflets showing variations in size
  • 7 A wild genotype (MT 922) showing prominent extra floral nectaries
  • 8 Leaflets of two genotypes (RO 322, RO 330), showing dull and glossy nature
  • 9 Leaflets showing irregular (RO 886) (below) and smooth (RO 879) (above) leaf laminae
  • 10 Wild genotypes showing short, long and medium long petioles
  • 11 A wild genotype (AC 979) showing well separated leaf laminae with downwardly oriented petiolules
  • 12 Leaves of a wild genotype (AC 453) having curved leaflet margins (which gives boat shaped cross-sectional appearance of the leaflets
  • 13 -14 Sectional view of laminae of two Acre genotypes
  • 15-16 Sectional view of laminae of two Rondonian genotypes
  • 17-18 Sectional view of laminae of two Mato Grosso genotypes
  • 19 Cross sectional view of the lamina of an Acre genotype having thin midrib
  • 20 Cross sectional view of the lamina of an Acre genotype having thick midrib
  • 21 Cross sectional view of the lamina of a Rondonian genotype (RO 328), having thin midrib
  • 22 Cross sectional view of the lamina of a Rondonian genotype (RO 369), having thick midrib
  • 23 Cross sectional view of the lamina of a Mato Grosso genotype (MT 901), having thin midrib
  • 24 Cross sectional view of the lamina of a Mato Grosso genotype (MT 945), having thick midrib
  • 25-26 Cross sectional view of the laminae of two Acre genotypes having thin and thick palisade layer
  • 27-28 Cross sectional view of the laminae of two Rondonian genotypes having thin and thick palisade layer
  • 29-30 Cross sectional view of the laminae of two Mato Grosso genotypes having thin and thick palisade layer
  • 31-32 Cross sectional view of the laminae of two Acre genotypes having thin and thick spongy tissues
  • 33-34 Cross sectional view of the laminae of two Rondonian genotypes having thin and thick spongy layer
  • 35-36 Cross sectional view of the laminae of two Mato Grosso genotypes having thin and thick spongy layer
  • 37-39 Sections of the bark of a wild genotype showing the alignment of tissues in transverse, tangential longitudinal and radial longitudinal sections
  • 40-41 Radial longitudinal sections of the bark of two Acre genotypes with low number of latex vessel rows distantly placed and more number of latex vessel rows closely placed
  • 42-43 Radial longitudinal sections of the bark of two Rondonian genotypes ith low number of latex vessel rows distantly placed and more number of latex vessel rows closely placed.
  • 44-45 Radial longitudinal sections of the bark of two Mato Grosso genotypes with low number of latex vessel rows distantly placed and with more number of latex vessel rows closely placed
  • 46-47 Laticifers of Acre genotypes - narrow and large laticifers
  • 48-49 Laticifers of Rondonian genotypes - narrow and large laticifers
  • 50-51 Laticifers of Mato Grosso genotypes - narrow and large laticifers
  • 52-3 Tangential longitudinal sections of the bark of two Acre genotypes with lesser and more number of laticifers
  • 54-55 Tangential longitudinal sections of the bark of two Rondonian genotypes with lesser and more number of laticifers
  • 56-57 Tangential longitudinal sections of the bark of two Mato Grosso genotypes with lesser and more number of laticifers
  • 58 Epidermal peeling of the adaxial surface of the lamina showing absence of stomata
  • 59 Epidermal peeling of the abaxial surface of the lamina showing stomata
  • 5 Summary
  • References