• HOME
  • Search & Results
  • Full Text
  • Thesis Details
 
Page: 320
 
Full Screen

  • TITLE
  • DECLARATION
  • CERTIFICATE
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • CONTENTS
  • LIST OF TABLES
  • LIST OF FIGURES
  • LIST OF APPENDICES
  • I. INTRODUCTION
  • CONTENTS
  • 1.1 lntroduction
  • 1.2 Curriculum and lnstruction
  • 1.2.1 Functions of the instruction subsystem.
  • 1.3 Curriculum Change: A Systems Approach
  • 1.3.1 System direction.
  • 1 (a) Master plan for Curriculum Development
  • 1.3.2 System requirement.
  • 1 (b): Continued Master Plan for Curriculum Development
  • 1.3.3 System Implementation.
  • 1 (c): Continued Master Plan for Curriculum Development
  • 1.3.4 Systern Validation.
  • 1.3.5 Structure of a Curriculum.
  • 1 (d): Continued Master Plan for Curriculum Development
  • 1.3.6 Changes in Teaching-Learninq Process.
  • 1.4 Modern Instructional Strategies: An Innovation in Teaching
  • 1.5 Need and Significance of the Study
  • 1.6 Statement of the Problem
  • 1.7 Meaning and Definition of Terms
  • 1.8 Objectives of the Study
  • 1.9 Hypotheses of the Study
  • 1.I0 Methodology in Brief
  • 1.11 Scope and Limitations
  • 1.12 Organisation of the Thesis
  • References
  • II. THEORETICAL OVERVIEW
  • CONTENTS
  • 2.1 Introduction
  • 2.2 Importance of Teacher Education
  • 2.3 Individualized Instruction
  • 2.4 Teachinq Strategies and Instructional Theory
  • 2.4.1 Evolving an instructional strategy.
  • 2.5 Modern Instructional Strategies
  • 2.6 Modular Strategy
  • 2.6.1 Design of a module.
  • 2.1 Building blocks of a Module
  • 2.6.2 Essential features of a module.
  • 2.6.3 Components of a module.
  • 2.6.4 Development of a module.
  • 2.2 Flow Chart of Learning Process of the Module: Individual Differences: Heredity and Environment
  • 2.7 Mastery Learning Strategy
  • 2.3 Flow Chart indicating Steps to be Followed in Teaching for Mastery Learning Strategy.
  • 2.7.2. The Essential Elements of Mastery Learning
  • 2.7.3 Fundamental Steps in Mastery Learninci Strategy
  • 2.7.4 Blooms Mastery Learnincl Strategy
  • 2.7.5 The Variables of Mastery learning
  • References
  • III. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
  • CONTENTS
  • 3.1. Instructional Strateaies
  • 3.2. Modular Strategy
  • 3.2.1. Studies conducted abroad.
  • 3.2.2. Studies conducted in India.
  • 3.2.3 Study conducted in Kerala..
  • 3.3 Mastery Learning Strategy
  • 3.3.1. Studies conducted abroad.
  • 3.3.2 Studies conducted in India.
  • 3.3.3. Study conducted in Kerala.
  • References
  • IV. METHODOLOGY
  • CONTENTS
  • 4.1 Objectives of the Study
  • 4.2 Hypotheses of the Study
  • 4.3 Method Adopted for the Study
  • 4.4 Tools Used for Study
  • 4.1 Secondary Teachers Training Institutions (B.Ed.) under the five Universities in Kerala.
  • 4.4.1 Description of tools.
  • 4.2 The weightages given to different Items of the Socio-economic status scale
  • 4.3 Weightage to content in the Achievement test
  • 4.4 Weightage to objectives in the Achievement test
  • 4.5 Weightage to difficulty level of question in the Achievement test
  • 4.6 Blueprint of Achievement test
  • 4.5 Validity and Reliability of the Tools Used
  • 4.7 Break-up sample of colleges
  • 4.1 Flow Chart of Learning Process of the Module: Individual differences: Heredity and Environment.
  • 4.6 Sample for the Study
  • 4.8 Teacher educators in the five Universities of Kerala.
  • 4.7 Statistical Techniques Used
  • References
  • V. ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
  • CONTENTS
  • 5.1 Methods of Teaching Adopted by Teacher Educators
  • 5.1 Teaching Methods adopted by Teacher Educators at Present in the Institutions of Teacher Education
  • 5.1.1 Opinion of teacher educators on adequacv of facilities.
  • 5.2 Distribution of Teacher educators with regard to their Difficulties in adopting various Modern Methods of Teaching.
  • 5.1.2 Library.
  • 5.3 Ranks given by Teacher Educators to the Objectives of the Library
  • 5.4 Ranks given by Teacher Educators on Common Defects found in Library Administration and Organisation
  • 5.1.3 Laboratory facilities.
  • 5.5 Ranks given by Teacher Educators on Measures for Improving Efficiency of Functioning of Library.
  • 5.6 Ranks given by Teacher Educators on the Existing Laboratory Facilities
  • 5.7 Ranks given by Teacher Educators on Additional Requirements for Laboratory.
  • 5.1.4 Audio-visual aids.
  • 5.8 Ranks given by Teacher Educators on the Inadequacy of Laboratory of Facilities
  • 5.9 Ranks given by Teacher Educators on the Inadequacy of Audio-visual Aids.
  • 5.2 Awareness of Teacher Educators on Modular Learning Strategy
  • 5.10 Ranks given by Teacher Educators on the Additional Requirements of Audio-visual Aids.
  • 5.2.1 Difference in the awareness of teacher educators on ModularLearning strategy.
  • 5.11 Comparison of Mean score of Awareness of Teacher Educators on Modular Learning Strategy in different Sub samples
  • 5.3 Awareness of Teacher Educators on Mastery Learning Strateqy
  • 5.3.1 Difference in the awareness of teacher educators on Mastery Learninq strategy.
  • 5.4 Attitude of Teacher Educators Towards Modern Instructional Strateaies
  • 5.12 Comparison of Mean score of Awareness of Teacher Educators on Mastery Learning Strategy in different Sub samples
  • 5.4.1 Difference in the attitude of teacher educators based on gender.
  • 5.13 Comparison of Mean Attitude scores of Male and Female Teacher Educators on SATMIS
  • 5.4.2 Difference in the attitude of teacher educators of urban and rural institutions
  • 5.14 Comparison of Mean Attitude scores of Teacher Educators of Urban and Rural Institutions on SATMIS
  • 5.4.3 Difference in the attitude of teacher educators of aovernment and private institutions.
  • 5.5 Effectiveness of Modular and Mastery Learning Strategies
  • 5.15 Comparison of Mean Attitude scores of Teacher Educators from Government and Private Institutions on SATMIS
  • 5.5.1 Maching of experimental and control groups.
  • 5.16 Comparison of Mean of the Socio-economic scores of Teacher Trainees from Government and Private Institutions.
  • 5.17 Comparison of Mean of the Socio-economic scores of Male and Female Teacher Trainees
  • 5.18 Comparison of Mean of the Socio-economic scores of Teacher Trainees from Urban and Rural institutions
  • 5.19 Comparison of Mean of the Socio-economic scores of Experimental and Control groups.
  • 5.20 Comparison of Mean of the Socio-economic scores of subgroups of Experimental and Control groups
  • 5.21 Comparison of Mean of the Academic Achievement scores of Teacher Trainees from Government and Private Institutions
  • 5.22 Comparison of Mean of the Academic Achievement scores of Male and Female Teachers Trainees
  • 5.23 Comparison of Mean of the Academic Achievement scores of Teachers Trainees from Urban and Rural Institutions
  • 5.24 Comparison of Mean of the Academic Achievement scores of Teachers Trainees from Experimental and Control Groups.
  • 5.25 Comparison of Mean Socio-economic scores of Sub groups of Experimental and Control Groups.
  • 5.5.2 Effectiveness of Modern Instructional Strategies.
  • 5.1 Achievement of Experimental and Control Group in Modular Learning Strategy
  • 5.26 Comparison of Mean Achievement scores of Experimental and Control Groups.
  • 5.27 Comparison of Mean Achievement scores of Experimental and Control Groups of Modular Learning strategy with regard to gender
  • 5.28 Comparison of Mean Achievement scores of Experimental and Control Groups of Modular Learning strategy with regard to Locale
  • 5.29 Comparison of Mean Achievement scores of Experimental and Control Groups of Modular Learning strategy with regard to Management of Institution.
  • 5.30 Significance of difference among Mean scores of Teacher Trainees of different Socio-economic status through Modular Learning strategy: Analysis of Variance
  • 5.31 Significance of difference among Mean scores of Teacher Trainees of different Academic Achievement at Graduate level through Modular Learning strategy: Analysis of Variance.
  • 5.32 Correlation Coefficients of Achievement through Modular Learning strategy with Socio-economic status and Achievement at Graduate level of the sample.
  • 5.33 Regression of Achievement through Modular Learning strategy on Selected Independent variables.
  • 5.34 Regression of Achievement through Modular Learning strategy on Independent variables which are having significant impact.
  • 5.35 Comparison of Mean Achievement scores of Experimental and control Groups through Mastery Learning strategy (MLS)
  • 5.2 Achievement of Experimental and Control Group in Mastery Learning Strategy
  • 5.36 Comparison of Mean Achievement scores of Experimental and control Groups with regard to Gender through MLS
  • 5.37 Comparison of Mean Achievement scores of Experimental and Control Groups of different locale on MLS
  • 5.38 Comparison of Mean Achievement scores of Experimental and Control Groups under different Management on MLS
  • 5.39 Significance of difference among Mean scores of Teacher Trainees of different Socio-economic status through Mastery Learning strategy (MLS): Analysis of Variance.
  • 5.40 Significance of difference among Mean scores of Teacher Trainees of different Academic Achievement of Graduate level through Mastery Learning strategy (MLS): Analysis of Variance
  • 5.41 Correlation Coefficients of Achievement through Mastery Learning Strategy with Socio-economic status and Achievement at Graduate level of the Sample.
  • 5.42 Regression of Achievement through Mastery Learning Strategy on Selected Independent Variables.
  • 5.43 Regression of Achievement through Mastery Learning Strategy on Independent Variables which are having Significant Impact
  • 5.44 Comparison of Mean Achievement Scores through Modular and Mastery Learning Strategies
  • 5.5.3 Feasibility of implementing Modern lnstructional Strategies.
  • 5.45 Comparison of Mean Achievement Scores through Modular and Mastery Learning Strategies among Sub samples
  • References
  • VI. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
  • CONTENTS
  • 6.1 The Study in Retrospect
  • 6.2 Objectives of the Study
  • 6.3 Hypotheses of the Study
  • 6.4 Summary of Procedure
  • 6.5 Tenability of Hypotheses
  • 6.6 Findings and Conclusions
  • 6.6.1 Opinion of teacher educators on adequacy of facilities.
  • 6.6.2 Awareness of teacher educators on Modular and MasteryLearning strategies
  • 6.6.3 Attitude of teacher educators about Modern Instructional Strategies.
  • 6.6.4 Effectiveness-of Modular and Mastery Learning strategies.
  • 6.6.5 Facilitating conditions for the effective implementation of Modular and Mastery Learninq strategies.
  • 6.7 Educational Implications
  • 6.8 Suggestions for Further Research
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • A. Training Colleges of Kerala State
  • B. Personal Data Sheet
  • C. Scale of Attitude Towards Modern Instructional Strategies (SATMIS) -Draft Form
  • D. Response sheet of SATMIS (Draft form)
  • E. Item Analysis of SATMIS
  • F. SATMIS Final Form
  • G. Response sheet of SATMIS (Final form)
  • H. Modular Awareness Questionnaire
  • I. Mastery Learning Awareness Questionnaire
  • J. Achievement Test-Draft Form
  • K. Response sheet of Achievement test (Draft form)
  • L. Item Analysis of Achievement Test
  • M. Achievement Test - Final Form
  • N. Response sheet of Achievement test (Final form)
  • O. Opinionnaire regarding the Physical Facilities and Academic Atmosphere in the Institutions of Teacher Education
  • P. Checklist to Find out the Methods of Teaching Adopted by Teacher Educators in the Institutions of Teacher Education
  • Q. Module on the Selected Topic Individual Differences
  • R. Mastery Learning Lesson Individual Differences