Online Thesis Search Results

TITLE
CERTIFICATE
DECLARATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
GLOSSARY AND ABBREVIATIONS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
I. INTRODUCTION
1. INTRODUCTION
2. NEED AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
3. OBJECTIVES
4. NULL. HYPOTHESES
5. SCHEME OF THE STUDY
II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
I. SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING
1.THE THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF SUBJECTIVE WELL BEING
Table 2.1 Component of Subjective Well-Being
Telic Theories (Goal Theories)
Pleasure and Pain Theories
Activity Theories
Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Theories
Associationistic Theories
Judgment Theories
Discrepancy Theories
Adaptation and Coping Theories
2. RELATED STUD1E: S ON SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING (SWB)
Cross cultural Studies in SWB
II. SELF-ACCEPTANCE
1.THE THEORETICAIL ASPECTS OF SELF-ACCEPTANCE
2.RELATED STUDIES ON SELF-ACCEPTANCE
III. AFFECT INTENSITY
1.THE THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF AFFECT INTENSITY
2. RELATED STUDIES ON AFFECT INTENSITY
IV. INTERPERSONAL ORIENTATION
1.THE THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF INTERPERSONAL ORIENTATION
2. RELATED STUDIES ON INTERPERSONAL ORIENTATION
V.HARDINESS
1.THE THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF HARDINESS
2.RELATED STUDIES ON HARDINESS
VI. SPIRITUAL HEALTH
1.THE THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF SPIRITUAL HEALTH
2.RELATED STUDIES ON SPIRITUAL HEALTH
VII.RELATED STUDIES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL RESOURCES IN GENERAL
III. METHODOLOGY
1. SAMPLE
Table 3.1 Region wise Distribution of Sample Colleges of South Thailand
Table 3.2 Region wise Distribution of Sample Colleges of Kerala
Table 3.3 Age-wise distribution of the sample
Table 3.4 Sex-wise distribution of the sample
Table 3.5 Family-wise distribution of the sample
Table 3.6 Course-wise distribution of the sample
2. TOOLS
3. PROCEDURE
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
SECTION I
Results obtained when Ss were compared in Subjective Well-Being and Psychological resources using T test
I. SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING (SWB)
Table 4.1.1 Subjective Well-Being of South Thailand and Kerala students.
II. PSYCHOLOGICAL VARIABLES
Table 4.1.2 Mean, SD. And t value of South Thailand and Kerala students in Selected Psychological Resources.
1.SELF-ACCEPTANCE
2.AFFECT INTENSITY
3. INTERPERSONAL ORIENTATION
4. HARDINESS
5. SPIRITUAL HEALTH
SECTION II
Results obtained when the relationships between Subjective Well-Being and Psychological Resources were studied using Pearson Correlation Product.
Table 4.2.1 Correlation of Subjective Well-Being and Psychological Resources of Kerala students.
1.SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND SELF-ACCEPTANCE
Table 4.2.2 Correlation of Subjective Well-Being and Psychological Resources of South Thailand students.
2. SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND A.FFECT INTENSITY
3.SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND INTERPERSONAL ORIENTATION
4.SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND HARDNIESS
5.SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND SPIRITUAL HEALTH
SECTION III
Results obtained when Ss were compared Subjective Well-Being and Psychological Resource in relation to Demographic variables using Two way ANOVA
Table 4.3.1 Summary of ANOVA for the Subjective Well-Being scores with respect to region and age of subjects.
Table 4.3.2 Mean and SD scores of Subjective Well-Being with respect to region and age.
Table 4.3.3 Summary of ANOVA for the Subjective Well-Being scores with respect to region and sex of subjects.
Table 4.3.4 Mean and SD scores of Subjective Well-Being with respect to region and sex.
Table 4.3.5 Summary of ANOVA for the Subjective Well-Being scores with respect to region and types of family of subjects.
Table 4.3.6 Mean and SD scores of Subjective Well-Being with respect to region and types of family.
Table 4.3.7 Summary of ANOVA for the Subjective Well-Being scores with respect to region and course of study of subjects.
Table 4.3.8 Mean and SD scores of Subjective Well-Being with respect to region and course of study.
Table 4.3.9 Summary of ANOVA for the Self-Acceptance scores with respect to region and age of subjects.
Table 4.3.10 Mean and SD scores of Self-Acceptance with respect to region and age.
Table 4.3.11 Summary of ANOVA for the Self-Acceptance scores with respect to region and sex of subjects.
Table 4.3.12 Mean and SE) scores of Self-Acceptance with respect to region and sex.
Table 4.3.13 Test of least significant pairs of men scores of Self-Acceptance with respect to sex..
Table 4.3.14 Summary of ANOVA for the Self-Acceptance scores with respect to region and types of family of subjects.
Table 4.3.15 Mean and SD scores of Self-Acceptance with respect to region and type of family.
Table 4.3.16 Test of least significant difference for the significant between Pairs of mean scores of Self-Acceptance with respect to type of family.
Table 4.3.17 Summary of ANOVA for the Self-Acceptance scores with respect to region and course of study of subjects.
Table 4.3.18 Mean and SD scores of Self-Acceptance with respect to region and course of study.
Table 4.3.19 Summary of ANOVA for the Affect Intensity scores with respect to region and age of subjects.
Table 4.3.20 Mean and SD scores of Affect Intensity with respect to region and age.
Table 4.3.21 Summary of ANOVA for the Affect Intensity scores with respect to region and sex of subjects.
Table 4.3.22 Mean and SD scores of Affect Intensity with respect to region and sex.
Table 4.3.23 Summary of ANOVA for the Affect Intensity scores with respect to region and type of family of subjects.
Table 4.3.24 Mean and S D scores of Affect Intensity with respect to region and Type of family.
Table 4.3.25 Summary of ANOVA for the Affect Intensity scores with respect to region and course of study of subjects.
Table 4.3.26 Mean and SD scores of Affect Intensity with respect to region and course of study.
Table 4.3.27 Summary of ANOVA for the Interpersonal Orientation scores with respect to region and age of subjects.
Table 4.3.28 Mean and SD scores of Interpersonal Orientation with respect to region and age.
Table 4.3.29 Test of Least significant difference for the significant between pairs of mean scores of Interpersonal Orientation with respect to age.
Table 4.3.30 Summary of ANOVA for the Interpersonal Orientation scores with respect to region and sex of subjects.
Table 4.3.31 Mean and SD scores of Interpersonal Orientation with respect to region and sex.
Table 4.3.32 Summary of AN OVA for the Interpersonal Orientation scores with respect to region and type of family of subjects.
Table 4.3.33 Mean and SD scores of Interpersonal Orientation with respect to region and type of family.
Table 4.3.34 Summary of ANOVA for the Interpersonal Orientation being scores with respect to region and course of study of subjects.
Table 4.3.35 Mean and SD scores of Interpersonal Orientation with respect to region and course of study.
Table 4.3.36 Test of least significant Difference for the significant between pair of mean scores of Interpersonal Orientation with respect to course of study.
Table 4.3.37 Summary of ANOVA for the Hardiness scores with respect to region and age of subjects.
Table 4.3.38 Mean and SD scores of Hardiness with respect to region and age.
Table 4.3.39 Summary of ANOVA for the Hardiness scores with respect to region and sex of subjects.
Table 4.3.40 Mean and SD scores of Hardiness with respect to region and sex.
Table 4.3.41 Test of Least significant difference for the significant between pairs of mean scores of Hardiness with respect to sex.
Table 4.3.42 Summary of ANOVA for the Hardiness scores with respect to region arid type of family of subjects.
Table 4.3.43 Mean and SD scores of Hardiness with respect to region and type of family.
Table 4.3.44 Test of least significant difference for the significant between pairs of mean scores of Hardiness with respect to type of family.
Table 4.3.45 Summary of ANOVA for the Hardiness scores with respect to region and course of study of subjects.
Table 4.3.46 Mean and SD scores of Hardiness with respect to region and course of study.
Table 4.3.47 Test of least significant difference for the significant between pairs of means scores of Hardiness with respect to course of study.
Table 4.3.48 Summary of ANOVA for the Spiritual Health scores with respect to region and age of subjects.
Table 4.3.49 Mean and SD scores of Spiritual Health with respect to region and age.
Table 4.3.50 Test of Least significant difference for the significant between pairs of mean scores of Spiritual Health with respect to age.
Table 4.3.51 Summary of AN OVA for the Spiritual Health scores with respect to region and sex of subjects.
Table 4.3.52 Mean and SD scores of Spiritual Health with respect to region and sex.
Table 4.3.53 Summary of ANOVA for the Spiritual Health scores with respect to region and type of family of subjects.
Table 4.3.54 Mean and SD scores of spiritual health with respect to region and type of family.
Table 4.3.55 Test of Least significant difference for the significant between pairs of mean scores of Spiritual Health with respect to type of family.
Table 4.3.56 Summary of ANOVA for the Spiritual Health scores with respect to region and course of study of subjects.
Table 4.3.57 Mean and SD scores of Spiritual Health with respect to region and course of study.
Table 4.3.58 Test of least significant difference for the significant between pairs of mean scores of Spiritual Health with respect to course of study.
V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
1. OBJECTIVES
2. NULL HYPOTHESES
3. METHOD
4. RESULTS
5. CONCLUSIONS
6. IMPLICATION OF THE STUDY
7. LIMITATIONS
8. SCOPE FOR FURTHER RESEARCH
REFERENCE
APPENDICES
I. PERSONAL DATA SHEET (PDS)
2. SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING INVENTORY (SUBI)
3. SELF ACCEPTANCE SCALE (SAS)
4. AFFECT INTENSITY MEASURE (AIM)
5.INTERPERSONAL ORIENTATION ScCALE (IOS)
6. HARDINESS SCALE (HS)
7. SPIRITUAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE (SHQ)