HOME
Search & Results
Full Text
Thesis Details
Page:
275
Full Screen
TITLE
DEDICATION
DECLARATION
CERTIFICATE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
PREFACE
CONTENTS
I. REVIEW OF ELECTRICAL CONDUCTION AND OPTICAL STUDIES IN ELECTROCHROMIC AND PHOTOCHROMIC THIN FILMS
1.1. Introduction
1.2. Earlier work
1.3. Electrochromism
1.4. Photochromism
1.5. Thermochromism
1.6. Electrochromic devices
Fig I.1. Structure of a typical arrangement of different layers in an eIectrochromic window
1.7. Energy band structure
Fig.l.2. Arrangement of different layers in an electrochrornic smart window
Fig.l.3. Energy band diagram for a typical insulator showing the valence band, conduction band and Fermi energy level.
1.8. DC conduction mechanism in Metal-Insulator-Metal (MIM) films.
1.8.1. High field conduction
1.8.1.1 Electronic Conduction
i) Conduction by means of the conduction band.
ii) Tunneling processes
Fig.l.4. Energy band diagram of conduction processes ina thin film insulator in a high applied electric field.
Fig.I.5. Energy band diagram of the conduction processes in a thin insulator film at a low applied electric field.
iii) Impurity conduction
iv) Space-charge effect
1.8.1.2 Ionic conduction
1.8.2. Low field conduction
Fig.l.6. Energy band diagram showing band bending atinsulator electrode interface.
1.8.2.1 Electronic impurity conduction
1.8.2.2 Ionic conduction
1.8.3. Temperature dependence
Fig.l.7. Arrhenius plot of conductivity of a typical insulator lor low fields.
References
II. APPARATUS AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES USED IN THE PRESENT STUDY
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Methods of preparation
2.2.1 Resistive heating evaporation
2.2.2 Electron beam evaporation
Fig.2.1. Schematic diagram of an electron beam gun.
2.3 Production of vacuum
2.3.1 Oil-sealed rotary pump
Fig.2.2. Cross-section of oil-sealed rotary pump.
2.3.2 Diffusion pump
Fig.2.3. Schematic diagram of cross-section diffusion pump,
2.4 Vacuum coating plant
Fig.2.4. Schematic diagram of a vacuum coating unit.
Plate 2.1 Photograph of the thin film vaccum coating unit used in the Laboratory
2.5 Substrate cleaning
2.6 Preparation of films
2.7 Preparation of MIM structure films.
Fig.2.5. Masks for Metal-Insulator-Metal film and its structural arrangement.
2.8 Measurement of the thickness of films
2.8.1 Optical Method (Multiple beam interferometry)
Tolanskys Fizeau fringes method
2.8.2 Quartz crystal thickness monitor
Fig.2.6. Arrangement and figure pattern of Fizeaufringes.
Fig.2.7. Block diagram of a quartz crystal thickness monitor
2.9 Measurement of electrical characteristics.
2.9.1 Conductivity measurements
2.9.2 Conductivity cell
Fig.2.8. Schematic diagram of electrical conductivity measurement
Fig.2.9. Schematic diagram of the cross-section ofthe conductivity cell.
2.9.3 Electrometer
2.9.4 Capacitance measurements
Fig.2.10. Measurement of resistance using Keithley programmable electrometer (model No. 617) in V/I mode.
2.10 Measurement of optical characteristics
2.10.1 UV-visible spectrophotometer
Fig.2.11. Electrical connection of Keithley programmable (model No. 617) electrometer for capacitance measurement.
2.10.2 Infrared spectrophotometer
Fig.2.12. Optical diagram of the spectrophotometer
Fig.2.13. Block diagram of the electrical system of the spectrometer
2.10.3 X-ray diffractometer
2.10.4 Optical microscopy
2.11 Measurement of thermal characteristics
2.11.1 Thermogravimetry - D T A
2.11.2 Thermo-EMF measurement
References
III. ELECTRICAL STUDIES IN MOLYBDENUM TRIOXIDE, VANADIUM PENTOXIDE, AND TITANIUM DIOXIDE FILMS.
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Experiment
3.3. Results and discussion.
3.3.1 DC electrical conductivity in coplanar geometry
Fig.3.1. Plot of log σ vs. 1/T for MoO3 films of thicknesses 165nm, 187nm, and 208nm coplanar geometry
Fig.3.2. Plot of log σ vs. 1/T for V2O2 films of thicknesses 45nm, 74nm, and 164nm in coplanar geometry
Fig.3.3. Plot of log σ vs 1/T for TiO2 films of thicknesses 94nm, 110nm and 153nm in coplanar geometry
Fig.3.4. Plot of log (σ T) vs. 1/T for MoO3 films of thicknesses 126nm, 150nm, and 163nm according to Motts formula.
Fig.3.5. Plot of log (σ T) vs. 1/T for V2O5 films of thicknesses 164nm, 254nm, and 299nm according to Motts formula.
3.3.2 DC electrical conductivity in sandwich geometry
Fig.3.6. Plot of log (σ T) vs. I/T for conductivity of TiO2 films of thicknesses 94nm, 11Onm, and 153nm according to Motts formula.
Fig.3.7. Plot of log σ vs. 1/T for MoO3 film of thicknesses 131nm, 156nm, and 194nm in sandwich geometry
Fig.3.8. Plot of σ log vs. 1/T for V2O5 films of thicknesses 127nm, 143nm, and 164 nm sandwich geometry
Fig.3.9. Plot of log σ vs. 1/T for TiO2 film of thicknesses 60nm, 110nm and 153nm in sandwich geometry
Fig.3.10. Plot of log (σ T) vs. 1/T for MoO3 films of thicknesses 131nm 156nm, 194nm in sandwich geometry according to Motts formula.
Fig.3.11. Plot of log (σ T) vs. l/T for V2O5 films of thicknesses 127nm, 143nm, and 164nm in sandwich geometry according to Motts formula.
3.3.3 Field dependent electrical conduction in Metal-Insulator-Metal structure
Fig.3.12. Plot of log (σ T) vs. 1/T for TiO2 films of thicknesses 60nm, 11Onm, and 153nm in sandwich geometry according to Motts formula.
Fig. 3.13. Plot of log I vs. V 1/2 for A1-MoO3 -A1 films of thicknesses 156nm, 181nm, and 194nm at room temperature.
Fig.3.14. Plot of in I vs. V1/2 for AI-V-0 -A1 films of 5V 0 thicknesses 113nm, 127nm, and 162nm at room temperature.
Fig.3.15.Plot of log I vs V1/2 for Al-TiO2 -Al films of TiO2 thicknesses = 60nm, 110nm. and 153 nm at room temperature.
Fig.3.16. plot of In (1/T2) v s 103/T at different biasing voltages for Al- MoO3 -Al film of MoO3 thickness 156nm
Fig.3.17. Plot of In (1/T2) vs. 103/T at different biasing voltages for Al-V2O3-Al film with V2O3 thickness 162nm
Fig.3.18. Plot of In (I/T2) vs. 10 /T at different biasing voltages for Al-TiO2 -Al film with TiO2 thickness 153nm.
Fig.3.19. Plot of in I with 10/T at different biasing voltages for Al-MoO3-Al film with MoO3 thickness 156nm.
Fig.3.19a. Plot of activation energy vs. biasing voltages for Al-MoO3-AI sandwich structure with MoO3 thickness = 156nm
Fig.3.20 Plot of In I with 10/T at different biasing voltages for Al-V2O5-al film with V2O5 thickness 162nm
Fig.3.20a. Plot of activation energy vs. biasing voltages for Al-V2O5 -Al sandwich structure with V2O5 thickness 162nm.
Fig.3.21. Plot of in I vs.10/T at different biasing voltages for AI-TiO2-Al film with TiO2 thickness 153nm.
Fig.3.21a. Plot of activation energy vs.biasing voltages for Al-TiO3 -Al sandwich structure of TiO2 thickness = 153nm
3.3.4. Studies of capacitance in Metal-Insulator-Metal structure.
Fig.3.22. Plot of capacitance vs.temperature for Al-MoO3 -Al with MoO3 thicknesses = 131nm, 156nm and 194 nm.
Fig.3.23. Plot of capacitance vs. temperature for A l -V2O5 -Al with V2O5 thicknesses = 81nm, 113nm, and 164nm
Fig.3.24. Plot of capacitance vs. temperature for Al-TiO2 -Al with TiO2 thicknesses = 60nm, 111nm, and 153nm.
Fig.3.25. Plot of capacitance vs. inverse of thicknesses for MoO3 film.
Fig.3.26. Plot of capacitance vs inverse of thickness for V2O3 film.
Fig.3.27. Plot of capacitance vs. inverse of thickness for TiO2 film
3.4. Conclusion
Fig.3.28. Plot In I vs. In V for Al-MoO3-Al films with MoO3 thickness 156nm, 181nm & 194nm
Fig.3.29. Plot of lnl with In V for Al-V2O5-Al film of V2O5 thicknesses. 81nm. 113nm, 127nm, and I62nm.
Fig.3.30. Plot of InI with InV for AI-TiO2 -Al film of TiO2 thicknesses 60nm. 111nm and 153nm.
References
IV. OPTICAL STUDIES IN MOLYBDENUM TRIOXIDE, VANADIUM PENTOXIDE, AND TITANIUM DIOXIDE FILMS
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Theory
Fig.4.1. Reflection and transmission of light by a single film
Fig.4.2. Plot of transmittance spectra vs.λ for MoO3 film of thickness 61nm.
Fig.4.3. Plot of transmittance spectra vs. λ for V2O5 film of thickness 208nm.
4.3 Experiment
4.4 Results and discussion
4.4.1 Optical constants
Fig.4.4. Plot of n and k vs. λ for MoO3 film.
Fig.4.5. Plot of n and k vs. λ for V2O5 films
4.4.2 optical band gap
Fig.4.6a. Transmission spectra of MoO3 film of thickness 187nm as a function of wavelength before and after UV irradiation.
Fig.4.6b. Transmission spectra of MoO3 film of thickness 211nm as a function of wavelength before and after UV irradiation in alcohol vapour.
Fig.4.7. Transmission spectra of V2O5 film of thickness 129 nm as a function of wavelength before and after UV irradiation.
Fig.4.8. Transmission spectra of TiO2 film of thickness 94 nm as a function of wavelength before and after UV irradiation.
Fig.4.9a. Plot of (α ħ ω) vs. ħ ω for MoO3 film in air
Fig.4.9b. Plot of (α ħ ω) vs. ħ ω for MoO3 film in alcohol vapour
Fig.4.10. Plot of (α ħ ω) 2 / 3 vs. ħ ω for V2O5 film
Fig.4.11 Plot of (α ħ ω) vs. ħ ω and (α ħ ω) vs ħ ω for TiO2 film
4.4.3 Infrared spectra of MoO3, V205, and TiO2 films
Fig.4.12. IR spectra of MoO3 film of thickness 134 nm.
Fig.4.13.K spectra of V2O5 film of thickness 127nm.
Fig.4.14.K spectra of TiO2 film of thickness 60nm.
4.4.4 X-ray diffraction studies
Fig.4.15. XRD pattern of MoO3 film; (a) as-deposited, film (b) film annealed at 250°c
4.4.5 Morphological studies
Fig.4.16. Micrographs of MoO3 film at (a) room temperature.
4.4.6 DC electrical conductivity while UV irradiation
Fig.4.17.Plot of σ vs. UV irradiation time for MoO3 film of thickness 208 nm; (a) after starting irradiation (b) after terminating irradiation.
Fig.4.18. Plot of σ vs. UV irradiation time for V2O5 film of thickness 164nm (a) after starting UV irradiation, (b) after terminating UV irradiation.
Fig.4.19. Plot of σ vs. TiO2 UV irradiation time for TiO2 of thickness 106nm. (a) after starting UV irradiation (b) after terminating UV irradiation
4.5. Conclusion
References
V. THERMAL STUDIES IN MOLYBDENUM TRIOXIDE AND VANADIUM PENTOXIDE FILMS
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Experiment
5.3. Results and discussion
5.3.1.TG-DTA studies
Fig.5.1. V2O5 thermo-emf study set-up.
Fig.5.2. TG-DTA curve of MoO3 film.
5.3.2.Thermo emf studies
Fig.5.3. Plot of thermo-emf vs.absolute temperature for Al-V2O5 film for various thickness.
Fig.5.4. Plot of TEP vs. inverse of temperature for AI-V2O5
5.4. Conclusion.
References
VI. ELECTRICAL AND OPTICAL STUDIES OF MIXED OXIDE SYSTEMS OF MoO3 AND V205 THIN FILMS
6.1.Introduction
6.2.Experiment
6.3 Results and discussion:
Fig.6.1. Plot of log σ vs 1000/T for MoO3 -V2O5 system in different molar concentrations. Thickness of the films is between 190-200 nm.
Fig.6.2. Transmittance spectra of MoO3 -V2O5 mixed mixed system in different molar concentrations as a function of wavelength.Thickness of the film is between 190-210nm.
Fig.6.3. Plot of (αħω) YS. (ħω) for different molar concentrations of MoO3 and V2O5 mtxed system.The thickness of the film is 190-21Onm.
Fig.6.4. Plot of n and k vs. wavelength (λ) for 90% MoO3: 10% V2O5 mixed system of thickness 194nm.
Fig.6.5. IR spectra of MoO3-V2O5 mixed systems in different molar concentrations and thickness of the range of 190-210.
6.4 conclusion
References
VII. DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF ELECTROCHROMIC WINDOWS USING MOLYBDENUM TRIOXIDE AND VANADIUM PENTOXIDE
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Operating principle
Fig.7.1. Optical properties of idealized
7.3 Experiment
Fig.7.2. All-solid type electrochromic window structure using MoO3
7.4 Results and Discussion
Fig.7.3. Lamination type window structure using MoO3-V2O5.
Fig.7.4. Transmission spectra as a function of wavelength for different applied voltages for all-solid type window.
Fig.7.5. Transmission spectra as a function of wavelength for different applied voltages for lamination type window.
7.5 Conclusion
References