• HOME
  • Search & Results
  • Full Text
  • Thesis Details
 
Page: 169
 
Full Screen

  • TITLE
  • DEDICATION
  • CERTIFICATE 1
  • CERTIFICATE-2
  • DECLARATION
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • CONTENTS
  • ABBREVIATIONS
  • 1. INTRODUCTION
  • 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
  • Classification of Microbial Proteases
  • Serine Proteases
  • Thiol Proteases
  • Acid (Carboxyl) Proteases
  • Metallo Proteases
  • Commercial Applications
  • Extracellular Alkaline Protease Production by Bacteria
  • Screening and Selection of Strains
  • Methods of Production
  • Bacterial Alkaline Protease Production by Submerged Fermentation
  • Table 1.Bacteria in which the extracellular alkaline protease production by SmF has been studied
  • Factors influencing alkaline proterase production by bacteria by submerged fermentation
  • Growth phase
  • Carbon source
  • Nitrogen source
  • Temperature
  • pH
  • Mineral salts
  • Age of inoculum
  • Size of inoculum
  • Agitation
  • Aeration
  • Incubation period
  • Two phase fermentation systems
  • Fed batch fermentation
  • Bacterial Alkaline Protease Production by Solid State Fermentation
  • Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
  • Bacillus licheniformis
  • Pseudomonas sp.
  • Purification and Characterization of Bacterial Alkaline Proteases
  • Table 2. Bacterial sources from which the extracellular alkaline serine proteases have been isolated, purified and studied
  • Molecular mass
  • Isoelectric point
  • Optimum pH and temperature for activity
  • Effect of metal ions on activity
  • pH and themostability
  • Stability towards detergents
  • Km value
  • 3. SCREENING AND SELECTION OF STRAINS FOR ALKALINE PROTEASE PRODUCTION
  • Section A - Screening and Selection of Strain for Alkaline Protease Production by Submerged Fermentation
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • Bacterial strains
  • Enzyme assay
  • Selection of high yielding strains
  • Identification of the highest yielding strains
  • Monitoring the stability of the highest yielding strains
  • RESULTS
  • Selection of high yielding strains
  • Table 3. Extracellular alkaline protease production by the top five high yielding strains and NCIM strains
  • Identification of the highest yielding strains
  • Table 4. Characters shown by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Stability of the highest yielding strains
  • DISCUSSION
  • Section B - Screening and Selection of Strain for Alkaline Protease Production by Solid State Fermentation
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • Bacterial strains
  • Selection of high yielding strains
  • Step 1 -Preliminary SSF studies
  • Step 2 -Detailed SSF studies
  • identification of the highest yielding strain
  • Monitoring the stability of the highest yielding strain
  • RESULTS
  • Selection of high yielding strains
  • Preliminary SSF studies
  • Table 5. Alkaline protease production by top five high yielding strains and NCIM strains in preliminary SSF studies
  • Detailed SSF studies
  • Table 6. Alkaline protease production by the high yielding strains in solid state fermentation systems with different moisture levels, incubated for different periods
  • Identification of the highed yielding strain
  • Stability of the highest yielding strain
  • DISCUSSION
  • 4. OPTIMIZATION OF CONDITIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ALKALINE PROTEASES
  • Section A - Optimization of Conditions for the Production of Alkaline Protease by Bacillus sp. K 25 by the Submerged Fermentation Method
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • Growth phase
  • Temperature of Incubation
  • Carbon and nitrogen sources
  • Salts
  • Age of lnoculum
  • Size of inoculum
  • Agitation
  • Incubation period
  • RESULTS
  • Effect of growth phase
  • Fig. 1. Time course of growth and alkaline protease production by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Effect of temperature of incubation
  • Fig. 2. Effect of temperature of incubation on alkaline protease production by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Effect of pH
  • Fig. 3. Effect of initial pH of medium on alkaline protease production by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Effect of carbon and nitrogen sources
  • Table 7. Effect of different carbon sources on alkaline protease production by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Table 8. Effect of various nitrogen sources on alkaline protease production by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Table 9. Effect of using starch and soyabean meal at different concentrations on alkaline protease production by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Effect of salts
  • Table 10. Effect of using different concentrations of sodium chloride on alkaline protease production by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Table 11. Effect of different salts on alkaline protease production by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Table 12. Effect of different concentrations of calcium chloride on alkaline protease production by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Table 13. Effect of age of inoculum on alkaline protease production by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Effect of size of inoculum
  • Table 14. Effect of inoculum size on alkaline protease production by Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Effect of agitation
  • Table 15. Effect of agitating the culture on alkaline protease production
  • Effect of period of incubation
  • Table 16. Effect of incubation period on alkaline protease accumulation in the culture of Bacillus sp. K 25
  • DISCUSSION
  • Section B - Optimization of Conditions for the Production of Alkaline Protease by Bacillus pumilus K 242 by the Solid State Fermentation Method
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • Solid substrate
  • Particle size
  • Moisture level, Temperature of incubation and Incubation period
  • pH moistening solution
  • Supplementation with carbon sources
  • Supplementation with nitrogen sources
  • Supplementation with sodium chloride
  • Age of inoculum
  • Size of inoculum
  • Medium volume: Flask volume
  • RESULTS
  • Effect of different solid substrates
  • Table 17. Alkaline protease production by Bacillus pumilus K 242 by SSF, using different commercially available substrates
  • Effect of size of particles of wheat bran
  • Table 18. Effect of using wheat bran of different particle size on alkaline protease production by Bacillus pumilus K 242
  • Effect of moisture level, temperature of incubation and incubation period
  • Table 19. Effect of moisture level, temperature of incubation and incubation period on alkaline protease production by Bacillus pumilus K 242
  • Effect of pH of moistening solution
  • Fig. 4. Effect of pH of moistening solution on alkaline protease production by Bacillus pumilus K 242
  • Effect of extra carbon sources
  • Table 20. Effect of supplementation of wheat bran medium with different carbon sources on alkaline protease production by Bacillus pumilus K 242
  • Effect of extra nitrogen sources
  • Table 21. Effect of supplementation of solid substrate medium with different nitrogen sources on alkaline protease production by Bacillus pumilus K 242
  • Effect of sodium chloride
  • Table 22. Effect of incorporating sodium chloride at different concentrations into the moistening solution, on alkaline protease production by BaciIIus pumilus K 242
  • Effect of age of lnoculurn
  • Table 23. Effect of age of inoculum on alkaline protease production by Bacilus pumilus K 242
  • Effect of size of inoculurn
  • Table 24. Effect of inoculum size on alkaline protease production by Bacillus pumilus K 242
  • Effect of the ratio, medium volume: flask volume
  • Table 25. Effect of varying the ratio medium volume: flask volume on alkaline protease production by Bacillus pumilus K 242
  • DISCUSSION
  • 5. PURIFICATION OF ALKALINE PROTEASES
  • Section A - Purification of Alkaline Protease from the Culture Supernatant of Bacillus sp. K 25
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • RESULTS
  • Fig. 5. Elution profile of alkaline protease of Basillus sp. K 25 from CM cellulose column
  • Table 26. Purification of extracellular alkaline protease of Bacillus sp. K 25
  • Fig. 6. Elution profile of alkaline protease of Bacillus sp. K 25 from Sephadex G- 100 column
  • Plate 1. Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of purified alkaline protease of Bacillus sp. K25
  • DISCUSSION
  • Section B - Purification of Alkaline Protease from the Bacterial Bran Extract of Bacillus pumilus K 242
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • RESULTS
  • Fig. 7. Elution profile of proteases of Bacillus pumilus K 242 from DEAE Sephadex A-50 column
  • Fig. 8. Elution profile of alkaline protease of Bacillus pumilus K 242 from Sephadex G- 100 column
  • Plate 2. Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of purified alkaline protease of Bacillus pumilus K 242
  • Table 27. Purification of extracellular alkaline protease from the bacterial bran extract of Bacillus pumilus K 242
  • DISCUSSION
  • 6. CHARACTERIZATION OF ALKALINE PROTEASES
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • Effect of pH on activity
  • Effect of temperature on activity
  • Effect of inhibitors on activity
  • Effect of metal ions on activity
  • Effect of pH on stability
  • Effect of temperature on stability
  • RESULTS
  • Effect of pH on activity
  • Fig. 9a. Effect of pH on caseinolysis by protease K 25
  • Fig. 9b. Effect of pH on caseinolysis by protease K 242
  • Effect of temperature on activity
  • Fig. 10. Effect of temperature on caseinolysis by protease K 25 andprotease K 242
  • Effect of inhibitors
  • Table 28. Effects of inhibitors on the activity of proteases K 25and protease K 242
  • Effect of metal ions on activity
  • Table 29. Effect of metal ions on the activity of proteases K 25 and K 242
  • pH stability
  • Fig. 11. Effect of pH on the stability of protease K 25 and protease K 242
  • Thermostability
  • Fig. 12. Effect of temperature on the stability of protease K 25 andprotease K 242
  • DISCUSSION
  • 7. STUDIES ON SUITABILITY OF PROTEASES OF BACILLUS SP. K 25 AND BACILLUS PUMILUS K 242 AS DETERGENT ENZYMES
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • Stability in presence of commercial detergents
  • Ability of proteases to act on insoluble substrate in presence of commercial detergents
  • RESULTS
  • Table 30. Stability of proteases of BaciIIus sp. K 25, Bacillus pumiIus K 242 andBadus licheniformis NCIM 2042 in commercial detergents
  • Table 31. Activity of proteases of Bacillus sp. K 25, Bacilus pumilus K 242and Bacillus licheniformis NCIM 2042 on blue case in-PAG in presence of different commercial detergents
  • DISCUSSION
  • 8. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY