• HOME
  • Search & Results
  • Full Text
  • Thesis Details
 
Page: 242
 
Full Screen

  • TITLE
  • DECLARATION
  • CERTIFICATE
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • CONTENTS
  • ABBREVIATIONS
  • LIST OF FIGURES
  • LIST OF TABLES
  • 1. INTRODUCTION
  • 1 INTRODUCTION
  • 1.1. AEROALLERGENS
  • 1.2. SOURCES AND SlZE OF AEROALLERGENS
  • 1.3. AIR SAMPLING
  • 1.4. INTERPRETATION OF SAMPLING DATA FROM AIR SAMPLERS
  • 1.5. ALLERGENIC FUNGI
  • 1.6. CLASSES OF ALLERGENIC FUNGI
  • 1.6.1. Oomycetes
  • 1.6.2. Zygomycetes
  • 1.6.3. Ascomycetes
  • 1.6.4. Basidiomycetes
  • 1.6.5. Deuteromycetes (Fungi imperfecti)
  • 1.6.5.1. Sphaeropsidales
  • 1.6.5.2. Melanoconoiales
  • 1.6.5.3. Moniliales
  • 1.7. ALLERGY
  • 1.7.1. Types of allergy
  • 1.7.2. Factors influencing allergenicity
  • 1.8. IMMUNOGLOBULIN E (IgE)
  • 1.8.1. IgE receptors
  • 1.8.2. Allergen
  • 1.9. ANTIGEN EXTRACTS
  • 1.10. OBJECTIVES
  • 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
  • 2.1. AEROBIOLOGY
  • 2.2. AEROMYCOLOGICAL STUDIES OUTSIDE INDIA
  • 2.3. AEROMYCOLOGICAL STUDIES IN INDIA
  • 2.4 CLINICO-IMMUNOLOGICAL STUDIES
  • 2.4.1 Allergenicity of airborne fungal spores
  • 2.4.2 Prevalence of fungal allergy
  • 2.4.3 Manifestations
  • 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • 2.1 AEROMYCOLOGICAL STUDY
  • 2.2 INTRAMURAL SAMPLING SITES
  • 2.3 SELECTION OF SAMPLING SITES
  • 2.3.1 Bakery environment
  • 2.3.2. Vegetable market
  • 2.3.3. Hospital ward
  • 2.3.4. Patients bedroom
  • 2.4. SAMPLING rECHNIQUES
  • 2.4.1. Air sampler
  • Fig. 1 Six stage Anderson type sampler with vacuum pump.
  • Fig. 2 Anderson type sampler with six stages shown separately along with vacuum pump.
  • 1. Six stage Anderson type sampler with vacuum pump.
  • 2. Anderson type sampler with six stages shown separately along with vacuum pump.
  • 2.4.2. Sampling procedure
  • 2.5. ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF AIRBORNE FUNGI
  • 2.6. EXPRESSION OF AEROMYCOLOGICAL DATA
  • 2.6.1. Calculation
  • 2.6.2. Dominant and frequent fungi
  • 2.7. CLINICO-IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
  • 2.8. COLLECTION AND STORAGE OF FUNGI
  • 2.9. MASS CULTURING OF THE ISOLATED FUNGI
  • 2.10. HARVESTING AND DRYING
  • 2.11. GRINDING
  • 2.12. DEFATTING
  • 2.13. PREPARATlON OF FUNGAL ANTIGEN
  • 2.13.1. Extraction
  • 2.13.2. Clarification
  • 2.13.3. Sterilization
  • 2.14. STERlLlTY TESTING
  • 2.15. STANDARDIZATION
  • 2.16. SKIN TEST
  • 2.16.1 Intradermal testing procedure of asthmatic patientswith the extracted fungal antigens (~hivfiri, 1962)
  • 2.16.2 Definition and grading of positive intradermal skin testreaction (Shivpuri, 1962)
  • 2.16.3. Patient selection for allergy evaluation
  • 2.16.4. Inclusion criteria
  • 2.16.5. Exclusion criteria
  • 2.16.6. Free informed consent
  • 2.16.7. Freedom from assault
  • 2.16.8. Confidentiality
  • 2.17. STATISTICAL METHODS
  • 2.17.1 Explanation of Tests
  • 2.17.2. Regression Analysis
  • 3. RESULTS
  • 3.1. AEROMYCOLOGICAL STUDIES
  • 3.2. FUNGAL TYPES
  • 3.2.1 AspergilIus niger
  • 3. Aspergillus niger. LM picture of conidiophore and conidia: X400.
  • 4. Aspergillus roger. SEM picture of conidia: X9000.
  • 5. Aspergillus niger. SEM picture of conidiophore and conidia: X1300.
  • 6. Aspergillus flavus. LM picture of conidiophore and conidia: X400.
  • 7. Aspergillus flavus. SEM picture of conidiophore and conidia: X1500.
  • 8. Aspergillus flavus. SEM picture of conidia: X12000.
  • 9. Aspergillus fumigatus. LM picture of conidiophore and conidia: X400.
  • 10. Aspergillus fumigatus. SEM picture of conidiophore and conidia: X1000.
  • 3.2.2 Aspergillus Flavus
  • 3.2.3 Aspergillus fumigatus
  • 3.2.4 Penicillium funiculosum
  • 11. Aspergillus fumigatus. SEM picture of conidia: X2000.
  • 12. Penicillium funiculosum LM picture of Penicilli and conidia: X400.
  • 13. Pen icillium funiculosum. SEM picture of Penicillus and conidia: X4000.
  • 14. Penicillium oxalicum. LM picture of Penicilli and conidia: X400.
  • 15. Penicillium oxalicum. SEM Picture of Phialide and conidia: X1000.
  • 16. Penicillium citrinum. LM picture of Penicilli and conidia: X400.
  • 17. Penicillium citrinum. LM picture of Phialide and conidia: X1000.
  • 18. Penicillium expansum. LM picture of Penicilli and conidia: X400
  • 3.2.5. Penicillium oxalicum
  • 3.2.6. Penicillium citrinum
  • 3.2.7. penicillium expansum
  • 3.2.8. Penicillium chrysogenum
  • 19. Penicillium expansum. SEM picture of Penicilli and conidia: X1500.
  • 20. Penicillium chrysogenum SEM picture of Penicilli and conidia: X3500.
  • 21. Cladosporium cladosporioides. LM picture of conidiophore and conidia: X1000.
  • 22. Cladosporium cladosporioides. SEM picture of condiophore and conidia: X2000.
  • 23. Alternaria alternata. LM picture of conidiophore and condia: X1000
  • 24. Rhizopus stolonifer. LM picture of sporangium and sporangiospores: X400.
  • 25. Rhizopus stolonifer. SEM picture of sporangiophore, collumella and sporangiospores: X2000.
  • 26. Rhizopus stolonifer. Sporangiospore: X8500
  • 3.2.9. Cladosporiurn cladosporioides
  • 3.2.10. Alternuria alternata
  • 27. Candida albicans SEM picture of blastospores: X10000
  • 28. Fusarium oxysporum. LM picture of macroconidia and microconidia: X1000.
  • 3.2.11. Rhizopus stolonifer
  • 3.2.12. Cundida albicans
  • 3.2.13. Fusarium oxysporum
  • 3.3. PREVALENCE OF ATMOSPHERIC FUNGAL TYPES
  • 3.4. BAKERY ENVIRONMENT
  • 3.4.1. Monthly average fungal concentration of dominant and frequentfungal concentration (CFU/m3) inside and outside bakeryenvironment
  • 1. Monthly average of dominant and frequent fungal concentration (CFU / m3) inside bakery environment during November 1998 - October 2000.
  • 2. Monthly average of dominant and frequent fungi concentration (CFU / m3) outside bakery environment during November 1998 - October 2000.
  • 3.4.2. Annual average colony concentration and percentage contributionof dominant and frequent fungal concentration (CFUm3) inside and outside bakery environment
  • 3. Colony concentration and percentage contribution of fungal types inside and outside bakery.
  • 3.4.3. Statistical significance in the comparison of means of dominantfungal colony concentration inside and outside bakeryenvironment i
  • 4. Statistical significance of dominant colony concentration inside and outside bakery.
  • 3.4.4. Seasonal variation of dominant fungal concentration (c17u/m3) inside and outside bakery environment
  • 5. Seasonal variation of Aspergillus niger inside and outside bakery.
  • 6. Seasonal variation of Aspergillus flavus inside and outside bakery.
  • 7. Seasonal variation of Cladosporium spp. inside and outside bakery.
  • 8. Seasonal variation of Penicillium oxalicum inside and outside bakery.
  • 9. Seasonal variation of Alternaria spp. inside and outside bakery.
  • 3.4.5. Effect of temperature (T) on total dominant colony concentration (cFu/~) inside and outside bakery environment.
  • 10. Influence of temperature (T) on total dominant fungi concentration (CFU / m3) inside and outside bakery.
  • 3.4.6. Effect of relative humidity (RH) on total dominant colonyconcentration (C F U I ~in~sid e and outside bakery environment
  • 11. Regression analysis of dominant fungal colony concentration in bakery with temperature.
  • 12. Influence of relative humidity (RH) on total dominant fungal concentration (CFU / m3) inside and outside bakery.
  • 13. Regression analysis of dominant colony concentration in bakery with relative humidity.
  • 3.5. VEGETABLE MARKET ENVIRONMENT
  • 3.5.1. The monthly average fungal concentration (c F u / ~ ~i) n side andoutside vegetable market environment
  • 14. Monthly average of dominant and frequent fungal concentration (CFU / m3) inside vegetable market environment during November 1998 - October 2000.
  • 15. Monthly average of dominant and frequent fungal concentration (CFU/ m3) outside vegetable market during November 1998 - October 2000.
  • 3.5.2. Average annual colony concentration and percentage contributionof dominant and frequent fungal concentration (C F U I ~ ~in) si deand outside vegetable market environment
  • 16. Colony concentration and percentage contribution of fungal types inside and outside vegetable market.
  • 3.5.3. Statistical significance in the comparison of means of dominantfungal concentration inside and outside vegetable marketenvironment
  • 3.5.4. Seasonal variation of dominant fungal concentration inside andoutside vegetable market environment
  • 17. Statistical significance of dominant colony concentration inside and outside vegetable market.
  • 18. Seasonal variation of Cladosporium spp. inside and outside vegetable market.
  • 19. Seasonal variation of Aspergillus niger inside and outside vegetable market.
  • 20. Seasonal variation of Aspergillus flavus inside and outside vegetable market.
  • 21. Seasonal variation of Penicillium citrinum inside and outside vegetable market.
  • 22. Seasonal variation of Pencillium oxalicum inside and outside vegetable market.
  • 3.5.5. Effect of temperature (T) on total dominant colony concentration (C F U I ~in~s) id e and outside vegetable market environment
  • 23. Influence of temperature (T) on total dominant fungal concentration (CFU/ m3) inside and outside vegetable market.
  • 3.5.6. Effect of relative humidity (RH) on total dominant colonyconcentration (c F u I ~ ~in~s) id e an8 outside vegetable marketenvironment.
  • 24. Regression analysis of dominant colony concentration of vegetable market with temperature.
  • 25. Influence of relative humidity (RH) on total dominant fungal concentration (CFU/ m) inside and outside vegetable market.
  • 3.6. HOSPITAL WARD ENVIRONMENT
  • 26. Regression analysis of dominant colony concentration of vegetable market with relative humidity.
  • 3.6.1. The monthly average fungal concentration inside and outsidehospital ward environment.
  • 27. Monthly average of dominant and frequent fungal concentration (CFU/ m3) inside hospital ward environment during November 1998 - October 2000.
  • 28. Monthly average of dominant and frequent fungal concentration (CFU/ m3) outside hospital ward during November 1998 - October 2000.
  • 3.6.2. Annual average colony concentration and percentage contributionof dominant and frequent fungal concentration (CFU/m3) insideand outside hospital ward environment
  • 29. Colony concentration and percentage contribution of fungal types inside and outside hospital ward.
  • 3.6.3. Statistical significance in the comparison of means of dominantcolony concentration inside and outside hospital ward
  • 3.6.4. Seasonal variation of dominant fungal concentration (CFU/m3) inside and outside hospital ward
  • 30. Statistical significance of dominant colony concentration inside and outside hospital ward.
  • 31. Seasonal variation shown by Aspergillus niger inside and outside hospital ward.
  • 32. Seasonal variation of Cladosporium spp. inside and outside hospital ward.
  • 33. Seasonal variation of Penicillium oxalicum inside and outside hospital ward.
  • 34. Seasonal variation of Aspergillus flavus inside and outside hospital ward.
  • 3.6.5. Effect of temperature (T) on total dominant colony concentration (CFU/m3) inside and outside hospital ward
  • 35. Influence of temperature (T) on total dominant fungi concentration (CFU/ m) inside and outside hospital ward.
  • 3.6.6. Effect of relative humidity (RH) on total dominant colonyconcentration (CFU/m3) inside and outside hospital ward
  • 36. Regression analysis of dominant colony concentration of hospital ward with temperature.
  • 37. Influence of relative humidity (RH) on total dominant fungi concentration (CFU/ m3) inside and outside hospital ward.
  • 38. Regression analysis of dominant colony concentration of hospital ward with relative humidity.
  • 3.7. ASTHMATIC PATIENTS BEDROOM ENVIRONMENT
  • 3.7.1. The monthly average fungal concentration inside asthmaticpatients bedroom and outside
  • 39. Monthly average of dominant and frequent fungal concentration (CFU/ m3) inside asthmatic patients bedroom environment during November 1998 - October 2000.
  • 40. Monthly average off dominant and frequent fungal concentration (CFU/ m3) outside asthmatic patients bedroom environment during November 1998 - October 2000.
  • 3.7.2. Annual average colony concentration and percentage contributionof dominant and frequent fungal concentration (C F U I ~ ~in) si deasthmatic patients bedroom and outside
  • 41. Colony concentration and percentage contribution of fungal types inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside.
  • 3.7.3. Statistical Significance in the comparison of means of dominantfungal colony concentration inside asthmatic patients bedroomand outside
  • 3.7.4. Seasonal average variation of dominant fungal concentration (CFU/m3) inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside
  • 42. Statistical significance of dominant fungi colony concentration inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside.
  • 43. Seasonal variation of Aspergillus niger inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside.
  • 44. Seasonal variation of Cladosporium spp.inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside.
  • 45. Seasonal variation of Penicillium citrinum inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside.
  • 46. Seasonal variation of Aspergillus fumigatus inside asthmatic patientsbedroom and outside.
  • 47. Seasonal variation of Penicillium oxalicum inside and outside asthmatic patients bedroom.
  • 3.7.4. Effect of temperature (T) on total dominant colony concentration (CFUI~) inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside.
  • 48. Seasonal variation of Penicillium expansum inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside.
  • 49. Influence of temperature (T) on total dominant colony concentration (CFU/ m3) inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside.
  • 50. Regression analysis of dominant colony concentration inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside with temperature.
  • 3.7.5. Effect of relative humidity (RH) on total dominant colonyconcentration (C: FUI~) inside asthmatic patients bedroom andoutsid
  • 51. Influence of relative humidity (RH) on total dominant colony concentration (CFU/ m3) inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside.
  • 52. Statistical significance of dominant colony concentration inside asthmatic patients bedroom and outside with relative humidity.
  • 3.8. CLINIC0 - IMMUNOIAOGICAL STUDIES
  • 3.8.1. RESULTS OF SKIN TESTS
  • 3.8.2. SEXWISE CI.ASSIF1CATION OF PATIENTS IN DIFFERENT AGE
  • 53. Age groups and sex of patients studied.
  • 3.8.3. REACTION TO Penicillium oxalicum
  • 54. Agewise classification of reaction to Penicillium oxalicum.
  • 3.8.4. REACTIONS TO Alternaria spp.
  • 55. Sexwise classifcation of reaction to Penicillium oxalicum.
  • 56. Agewise classification of reaction to Alternaria spp.
  • 57. Sexwise classification of reaction to Alternaria spp.
  • 3.8.5. REACTION TO Penicifiium expansum
  • 58. Agewise classification of reaction to Penicillium expansum
  • 3.8.6. REACTION TO Rhizopus stolonifer
  • 59. Sexwise classification of reaction to Penicillium expansum.
  • 60. Agewise classification of reaction to Rhizopus stolonifer.
  • 61. Sexwise classification of reaction to Rhizopus stolonifer.
  • 3.8.7. REACTION TO Penicilliurn citrinurn
  • 62. Agewise classification of reaction to Penicillium citrinum.
  • 3.8.8. REACTION TO Candida afbicans
  • 63. Sexwise classification of reaction to Penicillium citrinum.
  • 64. Agewise classification of reaction to Candida albicans.
  • 65. Sexwise classification of reaction to Candida albicans.
  • 3.8.9. REACTION TO Aspergillus furnigatus
  • 66. Agewise classification of reaction to Aspergillus fumigatus.
  • 3.8.10. REACTION TO Cladosporium spp.
  • 67. Sexwise classification of reaction to Aspergillus fumigatus.
  • 68. Agewise classification of reaction to Cladosporium spp.
  • 3.8.11. REACTION TO Aspergillusflavus
  • 69. Sexwise classification of reaction to Cladosporium spp.
  • 70. Agewise classification of reaction to Aspergillus flavus.
  • 71. Sexwise classification of reaction to Aspergillus flavus.
  • 3.8.12. REACTION TO Asprugillus niger
  • 72. Agewise classification of reaction to Aspergillus niger.
  • 3.8.13.COMPARlSON OF THE PERCENTAGS OF SKIN TESTREACTIONS WITH CLINICALLY SlGNIFICANT ANTIGENS
  • 73. Sexwise classification of reaction to Aspergillus niger.
  • 74. Comparison of the skin test reactions with antigens.
  • 3.8.14. CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT FUNGI WITH SKIN REACTIONS 2+AND ABOVE
  • 75. Fungi with 2+ and above skin reactions.
  • 4. DISCUSSION
  • 4.1. AIR BORNE FUNGI IN BAKERY
  • 4.1.1. Colony concentration and percentage contribution of dominantand frequent fungi inside and outside bakery
  • 4.1.2. Seasonal variation
  • 4.1.3. Temperature
  • 4.1.4. Relative humidity (RH)
  • 4.2. AIR BORNE FUNGI IN VEGETABLE MARKET
  • 4.2.1 Colony concentration and percentage contribution of dominantfungi inside and outside vegetable market
  • 4.2.2. Seasonal variation
  • 4.2.3. Temperature
  • 4.2.4. Relative humidily (RH)
  • 4.3. AIR BORNE FUNGl IN HOSPITAL WARD
  • 4.3.1. Colony concentration and percentage contribution of dominantand frequent fungi inside and outside hospital ward
  • 4.3.2. Seasonal variation
  • 4.3.3. Temperature
  • 4.3.4. Relative humidity (KH)
  • 4.4. AIR BORNE FUNGI IN ASTHMATIC PATIENTS BEDROOM
  • 4.4.1. Colony concentration and percentage contribution of dominantand frequent fungi inside asthmatic patientsbedroom andoutside
  • 4.4.2. Seasonal variation
  • 4.4.3. Temperature
  • 4.4.4. Relative humidity (RH)
  • 4.5. CLINICO - IMMUNOLOGICAL STUDIES
  • 4.6. SKIN TESTS
  • 4.6.1. Agewise and sexwise skin test postivity of asthmatic patients toclinically significant antigens
  • 4.6.2. Skin test postivity of asthmatic patients to - clinically significantantigens
  • 4.7. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PRESENT STUDY
  • 4.8. SCOPE FOR FUTURE WORK
  • 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
  • REFERENCES
  • APPENDIX
  • SITE 1: BAKERY ENVIRONMENT
  • SITE 2: VEGETABLE MARKET ENVIRONMENT
  • SITE 3: HOSPITAL WARD ENVIRONMENT
  • SITE 4: ASTHMATIC PATIENTS BEDROOM ENVIRONMENT